The most worrying thing about the Hong Kong government’s plan to amend the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance is that China could use it to extradite suspects from Hong Kong and put them on trial.
China’s judiciary is not independent, as Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Chinese Supreme Court President Zhou Qiang (周強), who is also secretary of the court’s Chinese Communist Party committee, have freely admitted. Politically sensitive trials are held in secret. A defense lawyer can even become a defendant in the middle of a trial.
In 2014, brothers Tu Ming-hsiung (杜明雄) and Tu Ming-lang (杜明郎) were executed in Taiwan for killing three Taiwanese and one Chinese national in China in 2011.
While trying their case, Taiwan’s Supreme Court said that China’s criminal justice procedure “has made clear progress with regard to fair trials and human rights safeguards,” but academics denounced this statement. The case had many dubious points and might have been a miscarriage of justice.
The Chinese and Hong Kong governments see Taiwanese as Chinese, so a Taiwanese whom China accuses of subversion could be extradited to China to face trial, like the associates of Hong Kong’s Causeway Bay Books and Taiwanese human rights advocate Lee Ming-che (李明哲)
Some people might argue that there is no need to worry because Hong Kong has no corresponding offense of subversion and is not listed among the extraditable offenses in the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance.
This argument is ridiculously naive. Hong Kong’s legislature supported the government’s extradition bill on its first reading, so what is to stop it adding subversion as an offense at a later date? Given China’s lack of judicial independence, what is to stop it from trumping up charges of another extraditable offense?
Hong Kong has much in common with Taiwan. Both are close neighbors of China, which has deeply influenced their languages and histories, and they have both been colonized by other countries. They have developed their own unique cultures. China’s suppression of Cantonese is similar to the efforts of past Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) governments to eliminate Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese), Hakka and Aboriginal languages.
“One country, two systems” has eroded Hong Kong’s independent character. Hong Kong’s experience shows what would happen to Taiwan following annexation by China.
For example: Hong Kong’s proposed adoption of China’s National Anthem Law, Chinese jurisdiction over part of the West Kowloon Railway Station, the huge influx of Chinese tourists who buy daily goods in bulk, the immigration of an average of 150 Chinese per day, the sky-high cost of housing, and now the extradition bill.
Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) was appointed, not elected. Her allies hold a majority of seats in the Hong Kong Legislative Council, half of whose members are not elected by the public. They always do what the Chinese central government wants, even if the public does not want it.
On June 9, hundreds of thousands of Hong Kongers took to the streets to defend their freedom and human rights. Thanks to them, Hong Kong will not easily become just another part of the Greater Bay Area.
Taiwanese should support Hong Kongers. They should cherish Taiwan’s hard-won democracy and freedom, and not give them up for illusions about “making a fortune.” If they let down their guard, they will deliver themselves into China’s hands.
Hugo Liu is a Hong Kong-born student at National Taiwan University’s College of Law.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under