Totalitarian dictatorships rely on two main tricks: eliminating people by killing them; and erasing household registrations and seizing property and assets. Chinese emperors throughout history have excelled at these tricks. Confiscating a high-ranking official’s assets yields many years’ worth of imperial wealth.
One well-known example is emperor Jiaqing (嘉慶) of the Qing Dynasty, who contrived the downfall of courtier Heshen (和珅), thereby enriching the throne.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has learned these tricks only too well. The violent clashes over Hong Kong’s extradition law are perhaps but a prelude to a bigger plot to gut Hong Kong.
“Emptying the cage for new birds” was Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference National Committee Chairman Wang Yang’s (汪洋) slogan when he ran Guangdong Province.
Ostensibly, the policy aimed to balance regional development and encourage businesses on the southeastern coast to turn to developing the northwest of the province. The prime land and factory locations made vacant by “emptying the cage” became money-spinners for the CCP, providing an unlimited budget to maintain stability.
China’s plan for the Greater Bay Area tightly penned in Hong Kong, and now Beijing is playing its trump card, using the proposed extradition law as an excuse to force rich Hong Kongers to move away. Once the cage is empty, it will be filled with corrupt, money-laundering officials and be used to feed the privileged.
Apart from stabbing Hong Kongers — and Taiwanese — in the back, the most terrible aspect of the extradition law is that it can be used to confiscate a person’s property and assets. No wonder Hong Kong billionaire Joseph Lau’s (劉鑾雄) first thought was to leave Hong Kong.
Many people think China fears a possible economic slump in Hong Kong, while others plan to emigrate.
This might be exactly what China wants: Since the 1997 handover, China has strategically allowed 150 Chinese per day to immigrate to the territory. Today, 1.5 million Chinese have been mixed into the Hong Kong population, which now stands at more than 7 million, squeezed like sardines into a tiny place, using up public facilities, medical and educational resources.
When even breathing is difficult for the young generation, how can there be any hope for human rights?
With tiny Hong Kong so close to huge China, any attempt to defend against these developments by referring to the “one country, two systems” fig leaf is futile.
Taiwan, the next target, should make an all-out effort to support Hong Kong as it too could share the same future, but politicians like Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are afraid to speak up.
With more than 1,000 US businesses and 85,000 Americans in Hong Kong, the fall of the territory would certainly harm the US’ interests. Perhaps US President Donald Trump is their last hope.
When the US-China trade dispute was at its most intense, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) went to Russia to be comforted by Russian President Vladimir Putin, hoping to form an alliance with him.
Seeing Xi and Putin sharpening their axes, Trump threatened to “immediately” impose more tariffs unless Xi attended the G20 summit. Giving rogues a taste of their own medicine is not necessarily a bad idea.
Taiwan’s risk exposure to Hong Kong in the financial sector amounts to NT$1 trillion (US$31.7 billion). Has everyone made adequate preparations before the storm?
Chen Chih-ko is a non-professional investor.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations