Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) last month reiterated that he is willing to participate in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential primary, responding: “Yes, I do” when asked in a TV interview on May 17.
Han has only been Kaohsiung mayor for six months, and the machinery of the city government is still unclear as to what his program for office entails and the city has not embarked on any major new development projects in this time. For Han to rashly throw his hat into the primary is inappropriate.
Furthermore, there is a fundamental difference between Han’s “yes, I do” and former US president Barack Obama, who campaigned on the slogan “Yes We Can” in 2008.
Speeches by Obama drew upon topics including US “articles of faith,” slavery, the “frontier spirit” and social justice to demonstrate what could be achieved through the collective will of the American people.
In contrast, Han simply emphasizes his own ideas, which is different from Obama’s focus on the interests of the nation and the American people.
Crucially, Han has only been in office for half a year and his presidential bid is a sign of his opportunism. He should focus all his energy on running the Kaohsiung City Government.
All politicians, regardless of political affiliation and ideology, are fond of political slogans and tub-thumping speeches — both while campaigning and afterward — to attract public and media attention. Catchy slogans are not just a form of self-promotion, they also connect the emotions of voters with the politics of the candidate or office holder. For this reason, politicians generally favor pithy, punchy slogans.
Han excels at verbal messaging. Perhaps it is relatively easy for him to think up such “gems of wisdom,” but he should exercise more caution over the promises he made to those who lent him their vote in addition to the ethical standards expected of all politicians.
Han might not become the KMT’s presidential candidate, but he is already setting an example for how not to do politics in Taiwan, with his actions indicating that it is okay for county commissioners and mayors to toss aside their promises to voters and eye bigger prizes should the opportunity arise.
Since Taiwan’s first directly elected president in 1996, the consensus among voters is that they should elect a person who is part of Taiwan.
A president should come under the close scrutiny of voters regardless of which side of the political divide they identify with.
Han has not only stayed aloof from Taiwan’s political circles for too long, his performance in the city council has been poor lately and he needs to put more effort into understanding how to run his Kaohsiung administration, not to mention his understanding of the solemn position of representing the nation as its president.
Time will tell, but Han might elope from his electoral pact with Kaohsiung residents. His performance in office to date shows that the political class, in particular opportunistic politicians such as Han, still have a lot to learn.
Ray Song is a graduate of the Institute of Strategic and International Affairs at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing