China’s Taiwan Affairs Office on Wednesday praised Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for comments he made in an interview with China Review News Agency on Thursday last week, saying Ko “has viewed cross-strait relations in a bold and positive way.”
Ko said in the interview that Taiwan-China relations were “neither diplomatic nor international relations,” but rather a unique relationship that involved mutual understanding and respect.
With Ko yet to announce whether he intends to run in the presidential election in January next year, it raises the question what the office’s intentions were in publicly praising the mayor. Perhaps it believed it could further divide the Taiwanese electorate and weaken the Democratic Progressive Party should Ko run, or maybe it is behind the election campaign of Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), who is vying for the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) nomination, and hopes it can distract the public from its involvement by publicly supporting Ko. China’s interference in Taiwanese politics is no secret, so neither of these possibilities is unthinkable.
If Beijing wants to use Ko as a tool for manipulating the election, it would have ample opportunity to do so when he visits Shanghai next month to attend the Shanghai-Taipei twin-city forum.
Ko might genuinely believe cross-strait ties can be handled in a pragmatic manner, but protests in Hong Kong this week should be enough to show him that nothing is free from politics when it comes to relations with China.
Former premier William Lai (賴清德) on Tuesday urged Ko to retract a statement that Taiwan and China belonged to “one family,” arguing that such rhetoric was unhelpful.
“It is an undeniable fact that China wants to annex Taiwan,” Lai said.
In response, Ko persisted with his stance, saying that his views were not political and that there would be trouble if Taiwan was “not even willing to express friendly intentions” to China.
It is unlikely that Ko has any ill intent in seeking closer relations with China, but his statements on cross-strait ties display his unwillingness or inability to see the threat it poses to Taiwan’s democracy and freedoms.
On May 30, Ko said China was “no longer like North Korea” and blamed President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for the current state of cross-strait ties, which he called “tense and unsolvable.”
Although some have lambasted Ko for wavering on his position regarding cross-strait ties, this is really not the case. On Aug. 12 last year, Ko said that Taiwan should seek “practical dialogue” with China and portrayed himself as the ideal person to facilitate this, as his experience as a surgeon has made him “practical and willing to listen to different opinions.”
Ko said at the time that Taiwan “cannot rely on others’ friendliness ... so economic capability and national defense must be bolstered while expressing friendliness.”
Ko cannot be faulted for shifting his stance on cross-strait ties, but his assertions that he somehow presents an alternative to the KMT is nonsense.
The KMT’s presidential candidates are saying the same thing using different words: They also want Taiwanese to believe that China can be a partner for trade and cultural exchanges, while being kept out of reach of the nation’s democratic institutions. That simply cannot happen, as China is vocal about pushing its “one party, two systems” framework.
As the elections approach, Taiwanese must understand that China is a package deal: Voting for a candidate who draws China closer means voting to bring unification closer.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.