Paul Lin (林保華) is a columnist for the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) who is widely admired for upholding democracy and resolutely opposing communism.
Regarding the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) ongoing preparations for a presidential primary, Lin has called for the pan-green camp to stand united so that there might still be a Taiwan-centric government following the presidential and legislative elections in January next year.
Lin is right, but I have some reservations about his column in the Liberty Times on Wednesday last week, titled “Opinion polls are not ballots — the part should defer to the whole.”
“Opinion polls are only for reference. Ideally, they should be conducted in such a way as to fully reflect public opinion and win votes, not just for someone to get through to the next round, because what is the point of winning the primary if you lose the presidential election?” he wrote.
The eventual purpose of a primary is indeed the presidential election that follows.
However, a victory in the primary now does not necessarily mean a victory in next year’s presidential election, because so many factors could change between now and then.
The most important thing about the primary is that it should be conducted fairly so that the DPP can pick the person who is in the strongest position to go into battle for the party.
A more crucial point for winning the presidential election is that the whole party must unite behind whoever wins the primary. The loser should wholeheartedly support the winner, but so far, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has not promised to do so.
Lin supports Tsai’s bid to serve a second term, which is fair enough, because Tsai has completed some reforms.
However, Lin wrote in his article that Tsai’s centrist line makes her more capable than her rival, former premier William Lai (賴清德), of attracting centrist voters who do not support “urgent” Taiwanese independence, but do support independence as the Republic of China.
This is doubtful. Numerous public opinion polls have shown that while Tsai has more support than Lai within the pan-green camp, Lai has stronger support among swing voters.
Lai has shown over the years that the “pragmatic Taiwanese independence” he calls for does not mean “urgent” independence, but popular self-determination, meaning that all Taiwanese should collectively decide their future.
Lin also wrote about procedural justice. In March 2011, then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) proposed a legal amendment to introduce absentee voting, because he thought it would help him get re-elected in 2012. Many commentators opposed such an ad hoc amendment that could make elections less fair.
In his April 27, 2011, Liberty Times column titled, “We must not contravene procedural justice,” Lin accused Ma of trying to change the rules of the game by introducing absentee voting, and combining presidential and legislative elections so that he could be re-elected.
This is comparable with the way the DPP’s “democratic mechanism” has been working recently.
The DPP’s Central Executive Committee has introduced procedural delays when the contest is already under way and changed the party’s method of conducting opinion polls.
Lin should speak out on the questions of procedural justice that arise from these maneuvers.
Lin Jin-jia is an attending psychiatrist at the Chi Mei Medical Center in Tainan.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry