When the world commemorated the 30th anniversary of the Chinese government’s brutal crackdown on peaceful protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989, public discussion of the events leading to the massacre remains off-limits in China.
Amnesia is incredibly dangerous, because it undermines the public’s moral and intellectual integrity, and lays the foundation for future violent persecutions.
Imposing collective amnesia is a signature feature of the state terror, and China is no exception. Accurate accounts of the Tiananmen Massacre are banned in the public domain.
Every time this year, Chinese authorities arrested political dissidents seeking to honor the massacre victims, and shut down their Sina Weibo accounts.
Beijing reinforces political quiescence and cynicism by denying people freedom of expression and assembly, and by propagating that China’s one-party rule and socialist economy are superior to multi-party democracy and free markets.
Unfortunately, a substantial portion of the Chinese population has accepted the post-Tiananmen bargain — “money yes, politics no,” expressing political loyalty in exchange for economic prosperity.
One long-term legacy of the Tiananmen tragedy is that authoritarianism has emerged as an influential geopolitical force in the early 21st century, with China and Russia championing anti-liberalism as an alternative to a teetering liberal order.
In contrast, the rest of the world strives to keep alive the Tiananmen memory in symbolic and substantive ways. Commemorating the June 4th anniversary has now become part of a global democratization project.
In Taipei, a gigantic inflatable model of the powerful “tank man” has been exhibited outside the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall since late last month. This icon of courageous resistance to military dictatorship transcends boundaries and inspires oppressed peoples worldwide.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) met with a delegation of former Tiananmen student leaders in the Presidential Office Building, and vowed to defend the nation’s fully fledged democracy against Beijing.
This high-profile gesture not only generated goodwill among exiled activists striving to democratize China, but also signified a new initiative to support democracy and human rights advocates in neighboring countries.
Undoubtedly, Hong Kong’s massive candlelight vigil attracted worldwide media coverage. More than 180,000 people gathered in Victoria Park to remember the victims and their families.
The huge turnout at the annual vigil was of great significance at many levels.
First, the event symbolized a smooth generational transition in the territory’s prodemocracy movement. The whole ceremony was presided over young activists, who were mostly born after 1997.
Since the months-long peaceful protests in late 2014, known as the “Umbrella movement,” the local pro-democracy struggle has become a youthful campaign.
Despite the imprisonment of several prominent leaders of the movement, many young activists have asserted themselves and stepped up to play a leadership role in this politically hostile environment.
Second, China’s democratic trajectory was thought to be better understood through the voices of Tiananmen survivors and human rights advocates.
This year’s annual vigil adopted the method of storytelling to emphasize unique personal experience. Accounts given by the Tiananmen mothers, and by Hong Kong student leaders and journalists who witnessed the massacre 30 years ago brought tears, sorrow and grief to everyone.
As Hong Kongers are now fighting for their rights and acting out their convictions in the public square, they learn from these historical actors a strong, if new, faith in democratic struggle.
Third, the vigil attracted numerous Mainland Chinese students and professionals residing in Hong Kong and visitors from across the border. The awakening experience might cause confusion and disorientation, but it would prompt them to reject amnesia about the past.
Once the Chinese authoritarian state cannot control their political thought, the ingrained ideologies of times past become obsolete.
Being a new theater of democratic laboratory for Mainlanders, Hong Kong provides a new social space to define and contest what democracy truly means to Chinese of all stripes.
Embracing universal values and norms, cultural diversity, and democratic governance is a learning process to foster an inclusive setting for people with vastly different opinions.
Whenever people gather to commemorate the Tiananmen anniversary in Taiwan, Hong Kong and China, they are actually exploring new modes of engagement to advance the unfinished project of democratization.
After all, justice, freedom and equality are not the result of abstract and wishful thinking.
Taiwan’s remarkable journey toward democracy and the ongoing political struggle among Hong Kongers have clearly demonstrated that democratic governance is deeply embedded in a genuine sense of localism and closely tied to everyday livelihood.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is professor of history at Pace University in New York City.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry