Last month’s elections to the European Parliament produced better results than one could have expected, and for a simple reason: the silent pro-European majority has spoken.
What they said is that they want to preserve the values on which the EU was founded, but that they also want radical changes in the way the EU functions. Their main concern is climate change.
This favors the pro-European parties, especially the Greens. The anti-European parties, which cannot be expected to do anything constructive, failed to make the gains that they expected.
Nor can they form the united front that they would need in order to become more influential.
One of the institutions that needs to be changed is the Spitzenkandidat system. It is supposed to provide a form of indirect selection of the EU leadership.
In fact, as Franklin Dehousse has explained in a brilliant, but pessimistic article in the EU Observer, it is worse than no democratic selection at all.
Each member state has real political parties, but their trans-European combination produces artificial constructs that serve no purpose other than to promote the personal ambitions of their leaders.
This can best be seen in the European People’s Party (EPP), which has managed to capture the presidency of the European Commission since 2004.
The EPP’s current leader, Manfred Weber, who has no experience in a national government, appears willing to enter into practically any compromise in order to remain in the parliamentary majority. T
that includes embracing autocratic Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.
Orban has posed a serious problem for Weber, because Orban has openly flouted European norms and established what amounts to a mafia state.
Nearly half the national parties constituting the EPP wanted to expel Orban’s party, Fidesz.
However, instead of following through, Weber managed to convince the EPP to make a relatively easy demand on Fidesz: allow the Central European University (CEU, which I founded) to continue functioning freely in Hungary as a US university.
Fidesz failed to comply. Even so, the EPP did not expel Fidesz, but merely suspended it so that it could be counted as part of the EPP when the president of the commission is chosen.
Orban is now trying to reestablish Fidesz as a bona fide member of the EPP. It will be interesting to see if Weber finds a way to accommodate him.
The Spitzenkandidat system is not based on an intergovernmental agreement, so it could easily be changed. It would be much better if the president of the European Commission were directly elected from a carefully selected list of qualified candidates, but that would require treaty changes
The president of the European Council could continue to be elected by a qualified majority of the member states, as the Treaty of Lisbon prescribes.
The reform that would require treaty changes is justified by the increased democratic legitimacy conferred by the European Parliamentary elections.
Turnout in the recent election surpassed 50 percent, up sharply from 42.6 percent in 2014. This is the first time that turnout has increased at all since the first election in 1979, when 62 percent of eligible voters participated.
Strangely enough, on this occasion, the Spitzenkandidat system promises to produce a dream team. French President Emmanuel Macron, who is opposed to the Spitzenkandidat system as a matter of principle, is largely responsible for this development.
At a dinner with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, the winner of Spain’s national general election, which preceded the European Parliament vote, the two leaders agreed to support two Spitzenkandidaten who would be ideal for the commission and for the council.
Germany is the main supporter of the Spitzenkandidat system. If Weber loses out, Germany will be pushing for Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann to become president of the European Central Bank (ECB).
He would hardly be ideal. In fact, he is disqualified by the fact that he testified before Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court against the ECB in a case seeking to invalidate it so-called outright monetary transactions, a policy that was crucial to overcoming the eurozone crisis earlier this decade.
I hope this fact will become more widely known.
Any other qualified candidate would be preferable to Weidmann as ECB president.
As things stand now, France will not have any of the top jobs. It would be a good thing if Germany did not have one either, because it would leave more room for other countries.
There are many EU institutions aside from the Spitzenkandidat system that require radical reform, but that can wait until we find out whether, and to what extent, the promise held out by the parliamentary election results is realized.
This is not yet the time to declare victory, relax and celebrate. There is a lot of work to be done to turn the EU into a well-functioning organization that fulfills its great potential.
George Soros, a pioneer of the hedge-fund industry, is chairman of Soros Fund Management and chairman of the Open Society Foundations.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations