Certain media outlets have in the past few years been encouraging parents to send their children to study at famous universities in China, and there is no shortage of principals and teachers from top-rated senior-high schools across Taiwan who have backed such moves.
When these outlets publish reports on the issue, they generally praise Chinese universities to the skies. They talk about how hard Chinese students study, how competitive the study environment is and how Taiwanese students’ minds would be broadened if they go there.
Reports like this, which sell “competitiveness anxiety,” are persuasive for some middle-class and richer Taiwanese parents, who were educated under the Republic of China’s party-state system and have been brainwashed by China-friendly media.
In addition, the Chinese government goes out of its way to win them over through policies such as lowering the requirements for students from Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau to gain admission to Chinese universities and providing more scholarships for them.
The number of students from well-known Taiwanese senior-high schools who have headed west to attend universities in China more than doubled from 6,000 in 2011 to more than 12,000 in 2017, figures published by China showed.
The exodus has added to a student shortage faced by higher-education institutions in Taiwan.
However, over the past couple of years, developing international situations have shaken the assumption that studying at a famous Chinese university is a guarantee of future competitiveness, of being able to pursue further education or of finding employment.
The US’ National Security Strategy, which was published by the White House in December 2017, viewed China and Russia as potential competitors and accused them of stealing US proprietary technology and “unfairly tapping into the innovation of free societies.”
The report listed this as a major national security issue and said that the US government would consider restricting visas for foreign students from designated countries who want to study in the US in the fields of science, technology, engineering or mathematics.
In June last year, the White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy published a report titled How China’s Economic Aggression Threatens the Technologies and Intellectual Property of the United States and the World, in which it accused Chinese students of being a potential threat to US national security.
That same month, the US government began restricting visas for foreign students aiming to study in designated technological fields such as aeronautics, advanced manufacturing technology and robotics.
This year, the US has started using a wide range of measures that are unfavorable for Chinese students and academics.
For example, some US institutions have started purging US-based academics who have joined China’s Thousand Talent Plan. Last month, Emory University dismissed two married researchers, one of whom had joined the Thousand Talent Plan, accusing them of concealing funding provided by China.
The US government has also started using visa application reviews to prolong the process for Chinese citizens applying for F (student), J (exchange visitor) and H-1B (temporary work) visas. The delays are apparently intended to frustrate these people so that they give up on their applications.
It is also rumored that big high-tech companies and ones in specific highly confidential and sensitive industries such as armaments and nuclear power are no longer accepting job applications from Chinese nationals or people with Chinese backgrounds.
These developments show that the situation faced by people with Chinese backgrounds who apply for jobs or to join master’s or doctoral programs in the US has taken a sharp turn for the worse.
As a US-China trade dispute gradually evolves into a new cold war, including a war on the scientific and technological front, it is likely that the situation for people with Chinese backgrounds who apply to study at US institutions or work in the US’ high-tech and other industries will become even more difficult and intolerable.
In view of these developments, Taiwanese parents should consider carefully whether they want to send their children to study in China.
Even without considering what political, economic and social risks might lie ahead with China, the present situation already means that them studying there cannot fulfill the expectation that attending a well-known senior-high school in Taiwan, followed by an elite Chinese university and then master’s or doctoral studies at an elite US institution would inevitably lead to a good job in the US or China.
A new cold war is unfolding at a pace that most people in this nation cannot imagine. As time goes by and the boundaries between the two sides in this new cold war are gradually established, there will no longer be opportunities for people with Chinese backgrounds to easily reap the dividends of studying and working in the US.
Parents should not cling to unrealistic expectations that will mess up the lives of their children.
Roger Wu is a senior assistant at a Kingstone bookstore.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs