A Latvian border guard helicopter hovers over a vast forest split by a long, narrow strip of sandy land where a fence topped with barbed wire marks the EU’s border with Russia.
Fifteen years after Latvia joined NATO and the EU, the Baltic state’s remote Latgale region — closer to Moscow than to Brussels — is among the bloc’s poorest areas, but its residents are staunchly pro-European. Smuggling cheap alcohol and cigarettes from Russia has been a mainstay of the local economy since Latvia regained its independence in 1991 after a half century of Soviet occupation.
A growing stream of illegal migrants crossing over from Russia, mostly from Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and Syria, prompted Latvian authorities to start building the fence in 2016 to protect a 300km stretch of the EU’s eastern border.
As Latgale gears up to vote in the European Parliamentary elections today, locals may differ on the candidates they choose, but there is no doubt that pro-European sentiment prevails overall, largely thanks to the EU’s generous development subsidies and open markets.
A eurozone member of 1.9 million, Latvia has absorbed a net 7.2 billion euros (US$8.1 billion) in EU subsidies since 2004, making it the bloc’s fourth-largest beneficiary per capita.
Nestled deep in the forest, Zilupe — population 3,000 — is one of the EU’s easternmost municipalities.
“The European Union is helping us like nobody before,” said Skaidrite Marcenoka, a local farmer and municipal official, as she reflected on Latvia’s turbulent history.
Over the past century, Latvians suffered under Nazi and Soviet occupations, which brought the Holocaust and then Stalinist-era mass deportations to Siberia.
Forced Russification and atheism during nearly half a century of Soviet rule was intended to strip Latvians of their language and cultural identity.
“Now, we’re receiving EU farming subsidies for agricultural machinery, better livestock and farm development,” said Marcenoka, who has used the payments to buy new equipment to run her 150-hectare farm.
Classified as “green” or eco-friendly, it receives about 230 euros for every hectare per year in direct EU farm payments.
“On average, the EU covers around 40 percent of agricultural investments,” Marcenoka added.
She also breeds Latvia’s traditional brown cows with Limousine and Charolais bulls from France, saying: “This way my own livestock becomes more European.”
Heading west away from the Russian border, vast forests give way to small patches of farmland and the occasional village or town able to overhaul often rickety public infrastructure thanks to EU funding.
“Over the last decade, we’ve received 16.2 million euros in EU funding for 90 different projects,” said Edgars Mekss, the mayor of Ludza, a poor rural town of 12,000 people.
“For every euro we spend for street repairs, construction works, laying water pipelines, church and synagogue restoration, we receive 4.7 euros from European coffers,” he said.
“Our border region won’t be able to develop and create new jobs without it,” he added, although some critics warn that a lack of oversight on how funds are spent raises the risk of graft.
For Andris Mejers, business is booming even without subsidies.
Latvia’s geopolitical shift from Moscow to Brussels has opened new, lucrative markets for his traditional Latgalian sausages, hams and smoked bacon.
“We take our simple rural food and travel all around the EU to various food fairs,” he said.
“In the past, we visited St Petersburg and Moscow; now that border seems closed, but others have opened,” he said, pointing to fellow EU members Germany, Poland and Sweden.
“I even went to Brussels with my sausages. All the documents by local authorities confirming the quality of my products are recognized internationally,” he said.
Committed euroskeptics are few and far between in Latgale and elsewhere in Latvia, where the latest eurobarometer poll suggested support for EU membership stands at 73 percent.
Fridijs Bokiss, a communist-era mayor of Ludza who cofounded the Socialist Party of Latvia after the Communist Party was outlawed, rails against NATO, but he expresses no such disdain toward the EU.
NATO ramped up its presence on its eastern flank since Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, setting up multinational battle groups in Poland and the three Baltic states.
Polls show that about 60 percent of Latvians supports the alliance.
“We must leave NATO to have a good relationship with Moscow and then reap benefits from both the EU and Russia,” he said, but was unable to name the rewards Latvia might receive from closer ties to Russia.
“We have a cross-border cooperation initiative with the Pskov region in Russia named Ezerzeme [Lakeland], but even that is financed by the EU,” he said.
His views are so unpopular that his Socialist Party sees no point in running in the European Parliament election later this month.
Turnout is expected to exceed the 30 percent recorded in the 2014 ballot.
“I’ll vote because I live in the proximity of [President Vladimir] Putin’s Russia, and Putin is like a novice driver at the wheel: You’ll never quite know what he’ll do next,” said Ilmars Ostrovskis, a Latgale businessman.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations