A Latvian border guard helicopter hovers over a vast forest split by a long, narrow strip of sandy land where a fence topped with barbed wire marks the EU’s border with Russia.
Fifteen years after Latvia joined NATO and the EU, the Baltic state’s remote Latgale region — closer to Moscow than to Brussels — is among the bloc’s poorest areas, but its residents are staunchly pro-European. Smuggling cheap alcohol and cigarettes from Russia has been a mainstay of the local economy since Latvia regained its independence in 1991 after a half century of Soviet occupation.
A growing stream of illegal migrants crossing over from Russia, mostly from Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and Syria, prompted Latvian authorities to start building the fence in 2016 to protect a 300km stretch of the EU’s eastern border.
As Latgale gears up to vote in the European Parliamentary elections today, locals may differ on the candidates they choose, but there is no doubt that pro-European sentiment prevails overall, largely thanks to the EU’s generous development subsidies and open markets.
A eurozone member of 1.9 million, Latvia has absorbed a net 7.2 billion euros (US$8.1 billion) in EU subsidies since 2004, making it the bloc’s fourth-largest beneficiary per capita.
Nestled deep in the forest, Zilupe — population 3,000 — is one of the EU’s easternmost municipalities.
“The European Union is helping us like nobody before,” said Skaidrite Marcenoka, a local farmer and municipal official, as she reflected on Latvia’s turbulent history.
Over the past century, Latvians suffered under Nazi and Soviet occupations, which brought the Holocaust and then Stalinist-era mass deportations to Siberia.
Forced Russification and atheism during nearly half a century of Soviet rule was intended to strip Latvians of their language and cultural identity.
“Now, we’re receiving EU farming subsidies for agricultural machinery, better livestock and farm development,” said Marcenoka, who has used the payments to buy new equipment to run her 150-hectare farm.
Classified as “green” or eco-friendly, it receives about 230 euros for every hectare per year in direct EU farm payments.
“On average, the EU covers around 40 percent of agricultural investments,” Marcenoka added.
She also breeds Latvia’s traditional brown cows with Limousine and Charolais bulls from France, saying: “This way my own livestock becomes more European.”
Heading west away from the Russian border, vast forests give way to small patches of farmland and the occasional village or town able to overhaul often rickety public infrastructure thanks to EU funding.
“Over the last decade, we’ve received 16.2 million euros in EU funding for 90 different projects,” said Edgars Mekss, the mayor of Ludza, a poor rural town of 12,000 people.
“For every euro we spend for street repairs, construction works, laying water pipelines, church and synagogue restoration, we receive 4.7 euros from European coffers,” he said.
“Our border region won’t be able to develop and create new jobs without it,” he added, although some critics warn that a lack of oversight on how funds are spent raises the risk of graft.
For Andris Mejers, business is booming even without subsidies.
Latvia’s geopolitical shift from Moscow to Brussels has opened new, lucrative markets for his traditional Latgalian sausages, hams and smoked bacon.
“We take our simple rural food and travel all around the EU to various food fairs,” he said.
“In the past, we visited St Petersburg and Moscow; now that border seems closed, but others have opened,” he said, pointing to fellow EU members Germany, Poland and Sweden.
“I even went to Brussels with my sausages. All the documents by local authorities confirming the quality of my products are recognized internationally,” he said.
Committed euroskeptics are few and far between in Latgale and elsewhere in Latvia, where the latest eurobarometer poll suggested support for EU membership stands at 73 percent.
Fridijs Bokiss, a communist-era mayor of Ludza who cofounded the Socialist Party of Latvia after the Communist Party was outlawed, rails against NATO, but he expresses no such disdain toward the EU.
NATO ramped up its presence on its eastern flank since Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, setting up multinational battle groups in Poland and the three Baltic states.
Polls show that about 60 percent of Latvians supports the alliance.
“We must leave NATO to have a good relationship with Moscow and then reap benefits from both the EU and Russia,” he said, but was unable to name the rewards Latvia might receive from closer ties to Russia.
“We have a cross-border cooperation initiative with the Pskov region in Russia named Ezerzeme [Lakeland], but even that is financed by the EU,” he said.
His views are so unpopular that his Socialist Party sees no point in running in the European Parliament election later this month.
Turnout is expected to exceed the 30 percent recorded in the 2014 ballot.
“I’ll vote because I live in the proximity of [President Vladimir] Putin’s Russia, and Putin is like a novice driver at the wheel: You’ll never quite know what he’ll do next,” said Ilmars Ostrovskis, a Latgale businessman.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with