When MacKenzie Fegan boarded a flight from New York to Mexico City, nobody asked for a passport or boarding card. Airline staff simply told the US writer to smile into a camera.
Within seconds, her photograph was matched against a US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) database and the-34-year old American was free to board.
“Did facial recognition replace boarding passes, unbeknownst to me? Did I consent to this?” she wrote to the airline, JetBlue, in a tweet that has since gone viral, highlighting widespread unease with an increasingly ubiquitous technology.
Computers have grown much better at recognizing faces in the past few years, unlocking myriad applications for facial recognition, from tracking criminals to counting truants.
Yet as cameras appear at unlikely spots across the globe, activists raise fears about lost privacy and say society might be on the doorstep of a dystopia where Big Brother sees all.
“We are entering a potential future where everywhere someone goes, the government knows who they are, who they are with and what they are doing,” said Adam Schwartz, a senior attorney at US rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
An all-knowing, all-seeing government sounds intimidating, said Fegan, who described herself as a politically active, queer woman of color of immigrant descent.
“Historically speaking, things haven’t gone great for people like me when repressive governments do come into power,” she said.
END VS MEANS
JetBlue’s facial recognition boarding process is part of a wider government pilot that began in 2017 and covers 15 US airports and several airlines, including Delta and British Airways, according to CBP.
The agency said the program, which it expects to cover 97 percent of all US outbound flights by 2023, aims to enhance security and speed up customs controls.
Rights groups question whether the end justifies the means.
“There is a tendency among governments, even when they have a legitimate goal ... to view new technologies as some kind of magic, but we need to make sure that all of these tools are the least intrusive effective methods available,” said Sarah St Vincent, a national security and surveillance researcher at Human Rights Watch.
She said the technology — and fear of its potential fallout — could in theory discourage perfectly lawful behavior, be it attending a protest, conducting an affair or meeting someone with a criminal conviction.
The technology also has accuracy problems, particularly in identifying people from ethnic minorities, she added.
A study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology last year found that three major facial-analysis programs were much better at recognizing light-skinned men than darker-skinned women.
CBP said its airport system has a match rate of 98 percent.
As of December last year, it had helped identify 7,000 people who had stayed in the country longer than allowed and six who had tried to enter with fake papers, it said.
Similar systems are being piloted at other airports, including Amsterdam’s Schiphol and Singapore’s Changi.
Airport security is a natural venue for facial recognition, because travelers are primed for identification checks, said Elke Oberg, a spokeswoman for German facial recognition company Cognitec.
People must first be told how it works, why it helps, where their data goes and whether they can opt out, she said.
JetBlue said that passengers were not required to board biometrically and were informed through gate announcements.
The company does not have access to customer photographs, which CBP said were all deleted within 14 days.
REGULATE US
Facial recognition has uses way beyond air travel and has been tested to read emotions, sexuality and personal traits that are unrelated to physical identity.
Police in London are testing the technology to see if it can accurately identify wanted criminals, with cameras installed at nine sites to check passersby against a database of offenders.
More than 90 percent of those stopped after a match had done nothing wrong, figures obtained by privacy group Big Brother Watch showed.
Many smartphones let users access their device with a glance into the camera, a step on from thumbprint recognition.
Singer Taylor Swift last year used facial recognition cameras to enhance her own security during a tour, Rolling Stone reported.
It said kiosks played videos of the star and would simultaneously photograph the viewers to check their images against a database of known stalkers.
Companies are training algorithms to recognize not only an identity, but also emotions, with far-reaching implications, said Amie Stepanovich, a lawyer specializing in cybersecurity at campaign group Access Now.
“Some emotional states have been found to be better at selling people things,” she said.
Stanford University researchers said they had developed software that could tell whether someone was gay or heterosexual — it analyzed photographs on dating Web sites to make its decision — in a 2017 study that was criticized as dangerous by LGBT groups.
Some within the industry say regulation is vital.
Schwartz said authorities should be banned outright from using the technology for sweeping surveillance.
The type and amount of data that private companies can collect should also be clearly limited, and customers ought to be given the possibility to opt out, he added.
Tech giants Microsoft and Amazon have backed legislation to ensure the technology is used with transparency and in a way that protects people’s rights in the US, where it is largely unregulated.
“Imagine a government tracking everywhere you walked over the past month without your permission or knowledge,” Microsoft president Brad Smith wrote in a blog last year.
“This has long been the stuff of science fiction and popular movies ... but now it’s on the verge of becoming possible,” he said.
Yet, it is important not to forget potential benefits, said Melissa Doval, chief executive officer of US facial recognition firm Kairos.
It could be used to verify age on dating sites to protect children from predators or identify drunk drivers, she said.
“Facial recognition can actually help to protect people,” she said. “At the end of the day it is going to come down to companies being held accountable for their ethical use of it.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry