The Philippines consists of 7,641 islands, more than 2,000 of which are inhabited. In Indonesia, my other home country apart from Taiwan, more than 7,000 of 17,504 islands are uninhabited. On these islands, there are no concerns about the insufficient nuclear disaster evacuation zones that Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is worried about.
It might be inappropriate to develop nuclear power in Taiwan, but exporting its technology and facilities to neighboring countries, such as the Philippines and Indonesia, is an option worth discussing.
The Bataan Nuclear Power Plant on Luzon Island in the Philippines was completed more than 30 years ago, but for political reasons it has never been commissioned, as anti-nuclear advocates say that it could be used by the US military to produce nuclear weapons.
The plant’s destiny is similar to that of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City, which has never gone into operation.
Perhaps Taiwan could discuss the handling of idle nuclear facilities with its closest neighbor. On the other hand, anti-nuclear forces in the Philippines have, to a great degree, been driven by anti-US sentiment.
Perhaps the Philippines could ease these concerns by working with Taiwan to seek a feasible way to start its plant, as Taiwan’s nuclear power technology is relatively mature and it is not directly linked to the US’ popularity.
In comparison, opposition to nuclear power is weaker in Indonesia, because its territory is much more vast. Three experimental nuclear reactors have been built on Java Island and other areas.
In contrast to Taiwan’s 2025 deadline for a nuclear-free homeland, Indonesia is planning to complete four nuclear power plants by 2025 and is working in close collaboration with countries such as Australia, Russia and South Korea on nuclear power technology.
Perhaps Taiwan could disassemble unused units at the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and sell them to Indonesia with a technology transfer from the Atomic Energy Council and National Tsing Hua University’s Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science in exchange for low-polluting natural gas.
Over the past few years, the Indonesian government has attempted to create more jobs so that overseas Indonesian workers can return home. As a result, Taiwan would have to change its practice of increasing work visa quotas for Indonesians in exchange for more natural gas.
By doing so, Taiwan’s thermal power plants could continue operating, thereby reducing carbon emissions. This would not only buy time to develop sources of renewable energy, but also indirectly achieve the goal of last year’s referendum on using nuclear power to promote renewable energy, as Taiwan could go green by selling nuclear power facilities and technology to Indonesia.
The number of immigrants in Taiwan is approaching 1 million. They are also part of the country.
I have had meetings with Indonesian lawmakers and Philippine Department of Trade and Industry officials that show that, with their multilingual and cross-cultural strengths, new immigrants can contribute to their Southeast Asian roots and their new home: Taiwan.
Faced with the controversy over whether to start the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, the government will hopefully live up to the human-oriented spirit of the New Southbound Policy and let new immigrants become the driving force behind the policy, taking practical action to find feasible ways to solve the energy problem.
Kimyung Keng, an Indonesian Taiwanese, is an assistant professor at Feng Chia University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this