On Monday last week, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) once again sent KJ-500 airborne early warning aircraft, Xian H-6K bombers, Shaanxi Y-8 jamming aircraft and Sukhoi Su-30 and Shenyang J-11 fighter jets across the Bashi Channel, circumnavigating Taiwan by flying southeast and then north along its east coast.
That day, experts and academics were busy analyzing the aircraft models and mounted loads, as well as making tactical conjectures.
That night, the China Military Web site — which is sponsored by the PLA — explained the PLA’s drill and published a talk by the spokesperson for the Eastern Theater Command on Sina Weibo and WeChat.
This information, which had not been seen before, lies at the core of the latest circumnavigation.
Compared with the Ministry of National Defense’s news release, which was fuzzy on numbers and the route taken, the Chinese Web site’s detailed report explained the responsibilities of the Chinese air force and navy.
The Eastern Theater Command spokesperson’s statement was a rare instance of someone standing on the frontline and claiming the PLA’s “legitimate and legal right” to circumnavigate Taiwan to “maintain peace in the Taiwan Strait.”
In his 2007 book Conflict In the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars, US Institute for National Strategic Studies research fellow Frank Hoffman provided the first definition of hybrid warfare, saying that future warfare would integrate a diversity of modes, employing a fused mix of conventional and irregular warfare relying on armed militias and civilians employing psychological public opinion and legal warfare, thus blurring the lines between target, place and mode.
These factors were apparent in the PLA’s drill last week.
At noon, some pro-China Facebook groups issued false news saying that PLA aircraft had entered Taiwan’s airspace, and at 3.30pm, the ministry announced that PLA aircraft were circumnavigating Taiwan.
When Japan’s Joint Staff announced models, numbers and routes of the aircraft returning through the Miyako Strait, Internet users began to compare differences between the ministry’s and the Japanese Ministry of Defense’s information, saying that the jamming aircraft had engaged in electronic warfare. In the evening the PLA’s spokesperson claimed on Sina Weibo and WeChat that its action was legitimate.
This shows that China used Internet users to take the initiative and engage in psychological warfare against Taiwan, and while the ministry tried to disguise its ineptitude by trying to make it seem as if it was intentionally hiding its abilities was exposed by the Japanese Joint Staff’s announcement, which was followed by the PLA’s employment of public opinion and legal warfare, and finished off with the distortions of the 50 cent army.
Compared with the PLA, the Taiwanese military’s thinking on psychological warfare remains stuck in the past century, and it is unable to respond to China’s use of Facebook, YouTube, Sina Weibo, WeChat and TikTok to spread false news.
The ministry’s Han Kuang exercise No. 35 on Monday, which used a computer-aided command center, marked the first time that false news attacks were included in an exercise.
Given China’s application of hybrid warfare, which fuses military and civilian participation and blurs the difference between peace and war, Taiwan’s military must speed up its efforts to catch up.
Lu Li-shih is a former instructor at the Republic of China Naval Academy and former captain of the ROCS Hsin Chiang.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs