On April 4, a group of international buyers’ associations from the garment, footwear, sporting and travel goods industries sent a letter to Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen to express concerns over abusive labor practices and human-rights violations. Already, Cambodia’s tax-free access to the vast EU market, granted under the EU’s Everything But Arms (EBA) scheme, is in danger of being suspended over such violations.
If the country is excluded permanently from EBA and other preferential trading arrangements, their sectors — and the Cambodian economy — would take a serious hit, the associations said.
Hun Sen claims that the international community is unfairly singling out Cambodia.
However, the truth is that intensifying pressure on the country is consistent with a broader global shift, in which investment is increasingly guided — even dictated — by environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors.
Gone are the days when strong ESG performance was a nice bonus for investors. Pension trustees and fund managers now insist that the companies in which they invest operate in ethical, transparent ways that limit reputational risk.
Investment decisions at emerging-market funds are thus increasingly preceded by rigorous ESG screenings — screenings that, after 34 years of Hun Sen’s dictatorial rule, Cambodia has no chance of passing.
Cambodia is being stripped of its natural resources — including timber, rubber and sand — for private gain. Environmental degradation — especially deforestation — is accelerating and corruption is running rampant, with cash from opaque sources flowing into Cambodia’s casinos, banks and real-estate market.
In February, the intergovernmental Financial Action Task Force put Cambodia on its “gray” watch list, saying that no money-laundering case has ever been prosecuted in the country.
Cambodia ranked 161st out of 180 countries in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index last year.
While Cambodia’s resources have enriched some, the country’s workers are afforded little protection and those fighting for change risk a violent end.
In 1997, a grenade attack on a peaceful protest in Phnom Penh, which I was leading, left 16 demonstrators dead. More than 100 others, including the trade-union activist and opposition leader Chea Vichea, were injured.
In January 2004, Vichea was shot dead in broad daylight.
Today, as the international garment associations said in their letter to Hun Sen, leaders of unions continue to face criminal charges and convictions for doing their job, and the Trade Union Law adopted in 2016 restricts the creation of new unions.
Hun Sen’s political opponents face similar repression.
Kem Sokha, the leader of the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP), of which I am a cofounder, was arrested in September 2017 and spent a year in prison before being transferred to house arrest.
He has been detained without trial for longer than the 18-month maximum dictated by Cambodian law.
The CNRP, which won close to half the votes cast in both the 2013 general election and local elections in 2017, was dissolved by court order ahead of last year’s general election.
With only fake opposition parties allowed to participate in that election, the ruling Cambodian People’s Party won every seat in the national assembly. With that, the Cambodian people have effectively been stripped of their right to self-determination.
In this context, it is impossible for any ethically responsible investor to justify doing business in Cambodia. That is why the buyers’ associations have called upon Hun Sen to establish a binding timetable for concrete improvements.
However, the chances that he will heed that call appear slim.
Insofar as the Khmer Rouge ever had an intellectual justification for the horrors they committed in Cambodia between 1975 and 1979, it lay in their belief that Cambodia had no need to participate in international markets and could, through sheer brute force, achieve autarky. Hun Sen, a former Khmer Rouge commander, appears to be clinging to a variant of this assumption.
This would prove to be a grave mistake. Chinese capital would never be sufficient to offset lost Western investment, and as Cambodia’s export goods compete with China’s domestic production, China imports little from Cambodia.
It does not have to be this way. Cambodia boasts unrivaled tourist attractions, large stores of natural resources that could be profitably and responsibly exploited, and one of the world’s youngest labor forces.
In the 1960s, it was one of Asia’s fastest-growing economies. By now, it could — and should — have become a middle-income emerging economy on par with Thailand and Vietnam.
Four decades after the Khmer Rouge were ousted from power, their reign of terror can no longer be used as an excuse for this failure. After all, Cambodia is not the only emerging economy with a troubled past. Other countries have recognized and adjusted to shifting Western investment priorities, raising their game in terms of environmental sustainability and human rights. They are now attracting growth-enhancing foreign capital.
Cambodia needs to do the same, with or without Hun Sen. Otherwise, it risks being left behind permanently.
Sam Rainsy, Cambodian minister of finance from 1993 to 1994, is the cofounder and acting president of the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party. He lives in exile.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry