Indonesian President Joko Widodo is one of Indonesia’s most devoted crusaders against fake news, and for good reason: It is personal.
The leader, known as Jokowi, who is campaigning for a second five-year term, has sought to keep voters focused on his track record of infrastructure building, tax reform and lower food prices.
However, social media-driven rumors — that he is not a pious Muslim, that he sympathizes with the banned Communist Party Indonesia, that he is of Chinese descent — have proved difficult to shake in the days leading up to tomorrow’s vote.
Illustration: Mountain People
Under Jokowi, Indonesia has grown into a trillion-dollar economy, inflation has more than halved and he has beaten the target to create 10 million jobs in his first term. However, his double-digit lead has narrowed in recent weeks, and religion remains a wildcard in his bid to defeat retired army general Prabowo Subianto to head the world’s most-populous Muslim-majority nation.
Questions of religious identity have become an increasing political issue in Indonesia, which was founded on secular ideals to unite a diverse archipelago stretching across three time zones.
While no major policy shifts are expected if Jokowi wins a second term, analysts see the possibility that Indonesia could take steps such as outlawing same-sex relations. Nearby Brunei recently introduced Islamic laws that punish gay sex and adultery by stoning offenders to death.
Ahead of this election, Jokowi sought to bolster his religious credentials by picking Ma’ruf Amin, the country’s most senior Islamic cleric, as his running mate. The move was seen as a reaction to the 2017 Jakarta governor election, when a Chinese-Christian political ally of Jokowi lost amid claims that he insulted Islam.
While the poisonous atmosphere of 2017 has yet to materialize in the presidential election, Jokowi’s opponents are raising questions about his faith in social media and door-to-door campaigns, said Douglas Ramage, managing director of Bower Group Asia in Indonesia.
“The social conservatism propelled by the majority community is here to stay irrespective of who wins the election,” Ramage said. “If Jokowi wins, he will have a senior cleric as his vice president and one could expect him to exert some influence on policies that reflect the growing preference for conservatism among Indonesian middle class.”
Conservative Islamic groups, who dislike Jokowi’s secular policies and his crackdown against terrorist groups, have rallied behind his Prabowo, as Subianto is popularly known. The groups, who demand the adoption of Shariah rules in the secular country, accuse Jokowi’s administration of unfairly detaining some Islamic clerics for criticizing the government. Jokowi has dismissed the allegations as baseless.
“I wanted to let the rumors die naturally, but since some people believe them, I have to make a clarification,” Jokowi told residents of an Islamic boarding school in Rembang in central Java on Feb. 1.
The president said his record should not be in question: He holds regular meetings with clerics in his office and has declared a national day in honor of Islamic students.
He revisited the issue again on March 23, urging people to combat fake news: “I need to clear the allegations because according to a survey as many as 9 million people believe them.”
On Saturday, the president called for unity as the seven-month-long election campaign drew to a close. Addressing a huge gathering of his supporters in Jakarta, Jokowi urged Indonesians, irrespective of their ethnic, cultural and religious differences, to remain committed to protecting the nation’s cohesiveness.
While the choice of Amin was seen as politically expedient in a country of 263 million people that is about 90 percent Muslim, he has struggled to match up the charisma of Prabowo’s pick for vice president, Sandiaga Uno, a former private equity tycoon.
Prabowo’s party was supported by powerful Islamic groups in the 2017 Jakarta governor election.
Still, disaffection with Jokowi stretches beyond questions over his beliefs.
After sweeping into the office on his common-man image and proven administrative skills as the former mayor of the central Java city of Solo, he is now facing growing dissatisfaction among the middle class for his failure to lift economic growth to 7 percent — a key promise of his 2014 campaign.
Had he reached that target, it would have created “decent employment,” former Indonesian minister of finance Muhamad Chatib Basri said.
While the national unemployment rate has fallen to a two-decade low, more educated young people are finding it difficult to land well-paid jobs, he said.
A growth rate of more than 5 percent amid a tough and weakening global economy was creditable, Jokowi said on Saturday, citing his government’s success in reducing poverty and unemployment levels.
“We will make sure our economy is stronger in the next five years,” Jokowi said. “We have to make sure our lives will be better in the next five years compared to now. There will be no people left below the poverty line. All of us have to advance.”
His priorities on foreign policy have yet to materialize.
“We have few indications as of yet as to how Jokowi’s foreign policy might change in a second term,” said Aaron Connelly, a research fellow on Southeast Asian politics at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. “I do not think that Jokowi’s selection of Ma’ruf Amin will have any affect on Indonesia’s relations with countries in the region.”
Muslim Indonesians had become more conservative over issues such as standards of dress over the past 20 years, Connelly said.
However, a recent survey shows “Muslims have also quietly become more tolerant on socio-cultural questions, like whether they are happy to have Christian neighbors or to have a church built in their neighborhood,” he said.
Jokowi has taken note of the urban disenchantment and has promised to focus more on providing jobs that can meet the aspirations of the youth.
Still, if he loses, it will likely be because a large number of Muslims opted to vote against Jokowi because top religious figures have been targeted for criticizing the government, said Rizal Ramli, a former minister in Jokowi’s Cabinet and an outspoken critic of his economic policies.
“Prabowo supporters are relentless and zealous in promoting Jokowi as a disaster for religious voters while promoting Prabowo as a good Muslim who will promote Islamic interests in Indonesia,” said Alexander Arifianto, research fellow with the Indonesia Program at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore. “This election will be a nail-biter. It will be very close and either one could win.”
There are few coincidences in the world of foreign diplomacy. Two days after a Japanese government donation of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines arrived in Taiwan on Friday last week, a US delegation led by US senators Tammy Duckworth, Dan Sullivan and Chris Coons touched down at Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport) in a US military transport aircraft, which flew in from Osan Air Base in South Korea. The cross-party delegation of US senators announced that Washington would donate 750,000 COVID-19 vaccine doses to Taiwan in the first wave of the US Foreign Vaccine Sharing Program. Japan and the US’ vaccine donations are
Over the past year, scores of gargantuan Chinese sand dredgers have deployed themselves in territorial waters off the Taiwanese-administered Matsu Islands, where their activities erode beaches and ruin fishing shoals. These Chinese ships are mercenary; a small 5,000 ton ship could sell a load of sand for the equivalent of US$55,000 to Fujian construction firms — or to the People’s Liberation Army for use in building its artificial reefs in the South China Sea. They also frustrate Taiwan’s government, which tries unsuccessfully to cooperate with Beijing on environmental stewardship of their contiguous waters. Each day, Taiwanese Coast Guard vessels can
US President Joe Biden has directed an intensive study of the origin of the coronavirus pandemic. In the process of that review, the intelligence community also should look at the larger question: Did China take advantage of the pandemic’s ravaging spread as a limited form of biological warfare against its perceived adversaries? The notion, as unthinkable as it might seem, is no longer as implausible or paranoid as it was earlier portrayed. Mounting questions and evidence have cast doubt on the likelihood that the deadly pathogen sprang naturally from an animal to human. Governments outside China are focusing attention on