Former Hong Kong chief secretary Anson Chan (陳方安生) and Hong Kong legislators Charles Mok (莫乃光) and Dennis Kwok (郭榮鏗) visited the US last month. During their 10-day visit, Chan met with US Vice President Mike Pence, while all three delegates were received by US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
The welcome they received was very encouraging for people in Hong Kong.
Chan is to make a further visit to Germany next month, when Hong Kong’s “father of democracy” Martin Lee (李柱銘) is scheduled to visit the US, together with three pro-democracy lawmakers.
These visits are sure to upset the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The CCP loves to accuse Hong Kongers of using foreign forces to boost their own stature, and it goes without saying that the communists are also afraid that Hong Kongers will receive the support of foreigners.
What CCP officials never ask themselves is why Hong Kongers turn to foreigners for help. China is also a powerful country, so why do Hong Kongers avoid clinging to China’s skirt?
The Chinese communists never reflect on such matters. Why do they not invite people from the pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong to visit Beijing? The communists have always seen pro-democracy figures as a major threat, and up to this day they still do not allow them to enter the Chinese mainland.
If China does not allow its own citizens to freely visit their own national territory, it is only natural for Hong Kongers to go abroad and “rely on foreigners” instead.
More than two decades have passed since 1997, when the UK handed Hong Kong back to China. In all that time, has there ever been a day when the Chinese Communist Party treated Kong Kongers well?
The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region promises that Hong Kong’s lawmakers and chief executive will eventually be elected by universal suffrage, but that promise has been canceled. Hong Kongers have been deprived of their freedoms of speech and reporting, and their right to elect government officials.
In 2003, the Hong Kong government tried to implement Article 23 of the Basic Law by proposing the National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill, but later withdrew it knowing that the Legislative Council would reject it.
Although the national security legislation has been shelved, the threat of it still hangs like the Sword of Damocles over Hong Kongers’ heads.
On March 29, the government introduced the Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019 to the Legislative Council for deliberation. This bill is like a dagger held against Hong Kongers’ throats.
Hong Kongers have taken to the streets and signed petitions in protest, but the government ignores us, leaving us with no choice but to turn to the US and friendly countries in Europe for help. Hong Kong is, after all, a major international city, and the human rights of foreign citizens living in Hong Kong are protected under the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration.
The CCP loves to “beat its own children behind closed doors,” but now the children in its doorway include blond-haired, green-eyed foreigners, so of course Hong Kongers have a duty to tell these children’s parents what is going on so that they can protect their kids.
Turning to foreigners for help is meant to squeeze the CCP where it hurts. Will it have the desired effect? Only time will tell.
Kot Chun is a writer from Hong Kong.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry