Although liberty, equality and democracy are deeply rooted in people’s minds, controversy at the London School of Economics and Political Science has triggered heated debate and made people reflect once again on the respect and inclusive spirit beneath these values.
On March 26, the institute unveiled a sculpture titled The World Turned Upside Down designed by Turner Prize winner Mark Wallinger.
Wallinger was quoted as saying: “This is the world as we know it from a different viewpoint. Familiar, strange and subject to change.”
The intention of the artwork was to inspire people to view the world from different perspectives, as well as to reflect on the spirit of progressive inquiry that has characterized the institute since its inception with the motto “rerum cognoscere causas” (“to know the causes”) on its badge.
However, the work with its profound meaning has been caught up in controversy.
Echoing the soul of the work as an academic, I would like to express my humble opinion to reconsider and reflect on this issue from a broader and more inclusive perspective.
As Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society in the UK, I was deeply moved by the astonishing concept of the design, which encapsulates the spirit of turning the world upside down to convey the anticipation of enlightening people to reflect on the world with broader and more inclusive visions, as well as bring liberty, equality and other shared values to understand and embrace this world. Its location at the London School of Economics and Political Science, a world-renowned institute, no doubt endowed this artwork with more educational impact.
Furthermore, the UN officially launched its Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in 2015, highlighting the critical issues that society is facing and emphasizing that everyone in the world should endeavor to achieve the goals, especially SDG No. 17, which stresses the importance of global partnerships.
Former UN Assembly president Mogens Lykketoft said that the “global goals will only be realized in a world of peace, security and respect for human rights.”
The spirit of the goals is also reflected in the artwork, with the title from a ballad of the same name that dates back to the English Revolution, or English Civil War, from 1642 to 1651. It was used as a tribute to Protestant reformer and political philosopher Gerrard Winstanley and the ideals of the Protestant Digger Community.
Winstanley’s “The True Levellers Standard Advanced” manifesto says that “when once the Earth becomes a common treasury again, as it must... Then this enmity in all lands will cease, for none shall dare to seek a dominion over others, neither shall any dare to kill another, nor desire more of the Earth than another.”
The artwork is full of inspirational insights, but it has accidentally triggered a controversy about sovereignty.
From the perspective of geography, the world already knows that Taiwan is no doubt one of the most important countries in East Asia, as it embraces and guards the values of liberty, equality and democracy, which are true values shared by society.
As a member of the world, Taiwan has its own identity and cherishes basic human rights.
SDG No. 17 says that identity and international space should be respected, rather than be suppressed by totalism. The coprosperity of all societies lies in global partnerships, which can only be achieved through respect and an inclusive spirit — the values beneath liberty, equality and democracy.
Most importantly, the human worth should not be represented with power, but practiced through humanitarian care, and the assurance and protection of the dignity and rights of all to have the basic human rights of liberty, equality and democracy.
However, a look back at human development shows that progress has not been smooth, but has zigzagged. The development and inheritance of civilization is never ending, with education playing an indispensable role.
The London School of Economics and Political Science — as a world-renowned institute that inherited fine traditions — should promote the civilization of society, rather than surrendering to powers.
Hopefully, it will reconsider its decision and prove to the world again that this first-class institute founded in a traditional democratic country is always persistent on the true values shared by human societies in all circumstances.
Chen Chih-wei is a fellow of the UK’s Royal Geographical Society and a visiting professor at University College London. He is on the National Council for Sustainable Development.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.