How do you beat right-wing populists? With pink socks, viral videos, condoms — and an iron determination not to let them decide what matters.
That is how Operation Libero is doing it anyway.
As advancing nationalist parties met in Milan on Monday to forge an alliance in the run-up to next month’s European elections, anti-populist activists in Switzerland might have some lessons on halting — even reversing — the seemingly unstoppable rise of right-wing populists.
Illustration: Mountain People
“It’s about the political space, who’s defining and shaping it, who’s communicating strategically within it, who, basically, is holding it,” Flavia Kleiner, 28, the group’s self-assured copresident, said over tea in a Zurich bookshop and coffee house.
“At the moment, in lots of places, it’s populists. Everywhere, the conversation’s about identity: who we are, where we’re from, the past. But that’s their turf. We have to go on the offensive — clear the fog, refocus attention, reframe the debate,” she said.
As the ground zero of post-war European populism, Switzerland is home to arguably Europe’s most consistently successful right-wing populist party, the Swiss People’s Party (SVP). For 25 years, the SVP had been steadily building its electoral success through a series of increasingly nation-first, anti-immigration popular referendums.
In February 2016, months after the SVP had scored its highest ever share of the vote, 29.4 percent, in national elections, with the political mainstream seemingly helpless to halt its advance, Switzerland went to the polls again, this time for an SVP-sponsored referendum demanding the automatic deportation of immigrants found guilty of even minor offenses.
Had the proposal passed, any of the nation’s 2 million non-Swiss residents — a quarter of the population — caught, for example, speeding twice in any 10-year period, could have been automatically returned to their homeland, with judges barred from considering personal circumstances.
It did not pass.
Voters rejected it overwhelmingly by 59 percent to 41 percent, on a higher turnout — at nearly 64 percent — than for any popular referendum in years.
“One moment we were talking about immigration and doing just fine,” the SVP’s leader said at the time. “The next, everyone was talking about rule of law. I don’t know what happened.”
What happened was Operation Libero.
The movement had just chalked up the first in an unbroken series of victories over popular referendums pushed by the SVP. The latest, on giving Swiss law precedence over international law, was defeated in November last year by 66 percent to 34 percent.
In cantonal elections in Zurich last month, which are seen as a reliable indicator for October’s national elections, the biggest losers, by far, were the SVP, whose share of the vote plunged lower than at any time since 1995.
“The populists don’t know what’s hit them, and they really don’t know how to deal with it,” said Constantin Seibt, one of the nation’s most respected journalists and editor-in-chief of Republik, a record-breaking, crowdfunded news start-up.
“All they can manage is to bleat: ‘It’s not fair. They’ve got all these young people, and somehow they keep turning everything we say against us.’ Well, those young people have changed the dynamics of the country. The populists seem to be running out of steam. It’s pretty cool,” Seibt said.
Operation Libero was formed by a handful of mainly student friends soon after the “political earthquake” of 2014, when the SVP narrowly won a potentially crippling referendum to curb EU immigration.
“We had to fight because we did not want to live in a country like this,” Kleiner said.
Also there at the beginning was communications director Silvan Gisler, 31, a former journalist.
“It was just: ‘Fuck, this really has just happened,’” he said in the group’s offices, which are based in a slightly scruffy office block around the corner from Zurich’s red light district. “And had everyone done enough to stop it? No.”
Operation Libero was a working title, but it “kind of stuck,” Gisler said. “You know, in football there used to be a player called the ‘libero’ — the last defender, but also the one who gives the first pass to the attack. And ‘operation’ conveyed urgency. We are a movement, not a party, but above all, we’re about values and action.”
From the outset, the group adopted a radically different approach. Its first, modest campaign was in late 2014, against another popular referendum, Ecopop, which envisaged “limiting the population to a level compatible with the preservation of the country’s natural resources” — notably, of course, by restricting immigration.
Helped by small-scale crowdfunding, the group launched a tongue-in-cheek campaign. An army of young volunteers handed amused nightclubbers condoms in bright pink packaging, commanding them to “prevent disaster: have sex against Ecopop.”
Soon after, it launched a campaign for same-sex marriage, which it is still pursuing.
“It’s vital that we’re not just reactive. That we say what we’re really for, not just what we’re against,” Gisler said.
The campaign includes viral social media videos featuring cute same-sex couples on ski lifts in wedding gear telling passersby they are “unhappily unmarried.”
The breakthrough, though, came that day in February 2016.
“It was clear that if we talked about criminal foreigners, we’d become the defenders of criminal foreigners,” Kleiner said. “We’d have lost before we started.
“Instead, we set the terms of the debate by portraying the SVP’s proposal as an attack against fundamental Swiss values. Against the constitution as a pillar of our liberal democracy; the rule of law; equal justice for all. We were the patriots here, because this was an attack on things that every Swiss citizen holds dear,” she said.
Kleiner said she first thought they might win the day she heard two women talking about the upcoming referendum in a shop: “One said: ‘Can you imagine? It would mean a family man, a father, being deported, just like that, for driving a bit too fast.’ And the other said: ‘I wouldn’t want that happening to me. It’s not right.”
Success brought money and the means to do more. Operation Libero has about 1,500 members paying an annual subscription of 50 to 100 Swiss francs (US$50 to US$100); 10,000 donors, mostly giving sums less than 250 Swiss francs; 5,000 volunteers on call and four regional sections. It employs seven part-time staff and is organized to a degree that is positively, well, Swiss.
The office is all charts and whiteboards, with six campaigns — some, still secret — mapped across weekly timelines. Post-it notes and to-do lists cover walls and desks. At clockwork-smooth morning meetings plans are discussed, projects refined, ideas floated, timings decided, messages polished, responsibilities allocated.
Of necessity, and because it works, much of the group’s work is online. Besides the viral videos, it enlists “online warriors,” more than 100 at any one time for major campaigns, to engage on social media platforms.
These are not trolls, Kleiner said.
They use their own names, offer arguments rather than invective and are under orders to stay polite and never escalate, she added.
Fuschia pink, Operation Libero’s brand color, vibrates everywhere. Merchandising, in the form of startlingly pink socks, sits in piles under desks.
“Trump sucks, Wilders sucks, Le Pen sucks, Petry sucks,” said one video, from two years ago. “Populism sucks. Make 2017 great again. Buy Libero socks.”
“You have to have fun,” Gisler said.
However, the group’s youthful enthusiasm — most Operation Libero staff are in their 20s or early 30s — is married to a campaign-hardened professionalism. The slogans, images and posters they devise themselves are as hard-hitting and attention-grabbing as those of their opponents, dreamt up by an expensive political advertising agency.
“We spend so much time getting them right,” Gisler said. “It’s so important to have the right content, smart content. To frame the debate right. Content has to have substance, depth, rigor. But it’s also how to say it — the visuals and the message. It has to be short enough, catchy enough, popular enough, to really break through.”
Kleiner wants eventually to see a new alliance of progressive, liberal democratic movements and parties across Europe, of which Operation Libero could be a part.
“The SVP say they’re defending ordinary Swiss people against the state and a global elite, but they’re actually weakening the structures and institutions that secure those very individuals’ freedoms,” she said. “It’s the populists who are on the attack.”
Politics now has moved far beyond the left-right divide, or even the progressive-conservative divide, she said.
“It’s increasingly, actually, about constructive versus destructive,” she said. “That’s really where we are.”
Her top tips for combating right-wing populism? Reframe the debate, obviously.
However, beyond that, “you have to be accurate, honest, understandable. You have to be serious about what you’re doing, responsible — but at the same time keep it fun, light. That’s not always easy. It’s really hard sometimes, actually. And you have to be positive,” she said.
Underpinning everything is an ambition just to “change the mood,” she said.
“The thing that’s there, but no one sees. To move away from the fear and pessimism the SVP have instilled in the Swiss mentality, change that narrative,” she said.
“We don’t want some defensive, inward-looking museum of a country. We’re looking forward, with hope, to a Switzerland we want to live in in 2050,” Kleiner said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations