There was a moment, back in the middle of last month, when Europe finally tuned in to Brexit.
It was not due to sudden economic concerns, but rather a morbid fascination at the spectacle unfolding in the UK.
Tales of stockpiling, emergency ferries and shortages of blood were one thing, but the paralysis in Westminster in the face of such an obvious impending crisis was incomprehensible to many Europeans.
Illustration: Mountain People
Unprompted, shop workers, baristas and taxi drivers asked what was going on. How could this happen, in Britain of all places?
German news magazine Der Spiegel captured the mood in its morning briefing for March 12, the day British Prime Minister Theresa May put her revised deal to a parliamentary vote for the second time.
“It’s painful having to watch this great European nation inflicting wounds on itself,” political editor Sebastian Fischer wrote. “It’s so unnecessary.”
May’s deal has now fallen at the third attempt and the prime minister is running out of options to deliver on Brexit.
However, whatever happens now, a breach with Europe is already evident and the troubled postwar relationship between the UK and its continental counterparts has taken a clear turn for the worse.
In truth, the UK’s vacillation over Europe should not come as a surprise to anyone who has observed Britain’s interactions with the continent over the years. From the outset, the UK had a very different notion of what European integration was for and where it should lead.
The fledgling European community of six nations was forged in 1950 after the horrors of World War II to prevent conflict from ravaging the continent again. Indeed, the call for a “kind of United States of Europe” was made by former British prime minister Winston Churchill four years earlier.
However, that founding vision required a political commitment to pool sovereignty, and for the UK that collided with a collective wartime memory of unity in the face of sacrifice and ultimately victory — its finest hour.
Britain has never managed to reconcile those conflicting concepts.
Then-French president Charles de Gaulle rebuffed Britain’s first attempts to join what were then the European Communities.
In a curious parallel, it was successfully admitted only at the third try — after De Gaulle left office — with then-British prime minister Edward Heath, the Conservative Party leader, signing the treaty of accession in 1972.
A referendum on membership instigated by then-British prime minister Harold Wilson’s Labour Party in 1975 was carried by 67 percent in favor to 33 percent against.
The people might have spoken, but the will of the Conservative Party was far from settled.
A youthful Margaret Thatcher campaigned for membership of the “Common Market,” but her faith in Europe was fundamentally altered by a singular, unforeseen event exactly 30 years ago, when she was prime minister: the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the prospect of German reunification.
Suddenly, the UK, with its 57 million inhabitants, faced being dwarfed by a combined West and East German population of more than 78 million, politically as well as economically. The imperative was for further integration, including plans for a single European currency, the euro, as a means of binding Germany to Europe to stop it from becoming too strong.
It was a tipping point, not just for Britain, but for the Conservatives too, said Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington.
At heart, “the UK was never on board with the political aspects of the European project,” he said.
A further blow was struck in 1992 on Black Wednesday, when then-British prime minister John Major’s Conservative government oversaw the humiliation of being kicked out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, a precursor to the euro.
The upshot was that a significant section of the Conservative Party, “which under Thatcher had been euroskeptic, but certainly pushing for more European integration, all of a sudden became implacably anti-Europe,” Kirkegaard said.
With Tony Blair’s arrival in Downing Street in 1997 came the prospect of a pro-European agenda.
However, Blair’s European credentials went the way of much of his early promise, crushed as then-British chancellor of the exchequer Gordon Brown blocked membership in the EU.
Former British prime minister David Cameron’s coalition with the pro-European Liberal Democrats failed to prevent him from using a speech at Bloomberg’s European headquarters in 2013 to promise a referendum on EU membership as a means of staving off the euroskeptics in his Conservative party.
The die was cast, and when he unexpectedly won a majority in the 2015 election, there was no backing out of holding an in-out vote.
However, even before taking the gamble that cost him his job and landed May in his place, Cameron’s approach to Europe was marked by tone-deaf acts that pandered to the euroskeptic media at home with little thought to its impact on his continental counterparts.
Pulling British Conservatives out of the center-right European People’s Party grouping in the European Parliament alienated potential allies such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel, an act that would come back to haunt him when he sought concessions on freedom of movement to help win the referendum.
Refusing to contribute to aid programs for countries such as Greece during the eurozone debt crisis added to a sense of Britain taking what it could from Europe while abandoning fellow members to their fate when in trouble.
None of this means that the EU27 will be happy to see the back of Britain, assuming it happens.
Germany’s powerful BGA exporters lobby, in its annual report released on Thursday last week, cited Brexit for a 4 percent decline in exports to the UK last year.
“This trend will probably intensify or at least persist in light of the further unresolved questions” over the UK’s plans, BGA president Holger Bingmann said.
Germany, the dominant EU power and its biggest economy, shares northern European traits with Britain that tend to elude France or Italy, like adhering to EU rules, implementing directives and a fondness for fiscal prudence.
German Minister of Justice and Consumer Protection Katarina Barley is a natural go-between: Born to a German mother and a British father, she studied in Paris, worked in Hamburg, Germany, and Luxembourg, and holds dual British and German citizenship.
Yet, even she is showing signs of losing patience at the political pantomime.
“We’ve seen negotiations for more than two years now, and we’ve seen delays being moved forward, and we still don’t actually have a clue on how this is going to end up,” she told Bloomberg Television on Friday last week.
Europe’s prevailing sentiment is one of “astonishment,” she said.
“We don’t really understand what is happening, because I think there have been votes on every possible solution now, and every time the answer is ‘No,’” she added.
Brexit-style arguments of nation versus Europe are playing out ahead of EU-wide elections for the European Parliament next month.
Yet, regardless of whether Britain takes part, none of the populist parties that rail against the EU are canvassing to follow its lead.
France’s Marine Le Pen and Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini are among those to have dropped their flirtation with ditching the euro, and even self-styled “illiberal” Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban does not dare risk quitting the bloc.
The EU can thank Britain’s shambolic example for that.
For Europe’s citizens, the moment of Brexit curiosity was fleeting and most have moved on. Britons do not have that luxury.
This week brings another round of votes in parliament. Even if the exit deal is agreed, the future relationship must still be hammered out.
Then there is the Irish backstop, which must be revisited in the middle of next year under the terms of the withdrawal agreement. There is also the very real threat of fundamental changes to the entire British political system, buckling under the all-consuming strain of Brexit.
“This is nonstop, it’s not going to change, we’re going to have exactly the same kind of debates happening as we have right now,” Kirkegaard said. “It’s basically not going to end.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry