Like most in the sleepy town of Phayao in Thailand’s northern mountains, schoolteacher Mu Suthibutr voted for parties loyal to former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra in election after election, even after the populist leader was ousted in an army coup and fled into exile.
However, on March 24, Mu cast his ballot instead for the candidate of a party backing the ruling junta, because he knows the candidate, a former Thaksin ally who switched sides, and thinks he “will be the most useful” for the town.
“Many feel that Thaksin will not be able to come back, so they have to vote for someone that they can depend on rather than what is in their heart,” Mu said.
The pro-junta party won in Phayao, the first time since 2001 that a Thaksin-loyal party has lost in a town that — like much of the north and northeast of Thailand — has long been a bastion of Red Shirt support for the former telecoms tycoon.
Phayao is part of a broader shift in Thailand politics as it returns to an electoral process after nearly five years of military rule, one that might make the country even more difficult to govern.
For years, the Southeast Asian nation has been divided between mostly rural and northern supporters of Thaksin and his fierce opponents — mostly urban and middle class — who revile him as a corrupt demagogue. Amid spasms of street protests, the rival camps became known as Red Shirts and Yellow Shirts.
Now, with the military entrenched in politics and the emergence of a charismatic figurehead of democracy who reminds voters of a younger Thaksin, the country’s political landscape is fragmenting.
Indeed, last month’s elections — the first since the 2014 military coup — have set the scene for protracted political deadlock, because no one party won the majority of parliamentary seats required to rule.
In Phayao, though, most people accept the result that gave its House of Representatives seat to the pro-army Palang Pracharat Party, which is seeking to keep coup leader Prayuth Chan-ocha on as an elected prime minister.
Voter accounts there of the pro-Thaksin Pheu Thai Party’s loss provide a snapshot of how Thaksin’s seemingly unshakeable grip is loosening even in his political heartland after more than a decade in self-imposed exile following an earlier coup.
Thaksin did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Despite the opposition of the Bangkok-based Yellow Shirt elite, parties loyal to Thaksin have won each election since 2001 thanks to his hold on the north and northeast. Thaksin still has legions of loyal supporters in these regions, but Pheu Thai’s share of their seats shrank in the latest election to 63.5 percent from 80.2 percent in 2011.
The loss of constituencies like Phayao illustrates that Thaksin’s absence, as well as recent missteps — one of his proxy parties nominated the king’s sister as its prime ministerial candidate and was promptly eliminated — have cost him votes, one analyst said.
“Pheu Thai cannot take the north and northeast for granted,” said Titipol Phakdeewanich, dean of the faculty of political science at Ubon Ratchathani University.
Phayao, surrounded by farms about an hour’s drive north of Thaksin’s home city of Chiang Mai, is the main town in the province of the same name.
Townspeople often sit in cafes or gather near a large lake in the city center to feed fish that swim up to the banks — and, after the election, they are happy to talk about politics.
One explanation several gave for the pro-junta Palang Pracharat’s win in the constituency is that its candidate, wealthy local businessman Thammanat Prompao, is well known in the community and also chairman of a local soccer team.
Thammanat, for years a prominent Pheu Thai leader, told reporters that he switched allegiance because he came to believe that if his former party won power, it would only bring more conflict.
He secured the constituency with 52,417 votes, compared with Pheu Thai’s candidate’s tally of about 21,971, according to results released on Thursday last week.
Phayao is not the only constituency where the junta’s proxy party fielded a former Thaksin loyalist — about 30 of its candidates in 350 constituencies nationwide were ex-Pheu Thai parliamentarians or prominent supporters.
Pheu Thai’s four-time parliamentarian from Phayao, Arunee Chamnanya, says she lost her seat “because the electoral process was not a fair fight.”
For example, Pheu Thai complained that it booked a local sports arena for a rally on Jan. 10, but provincial officials revoked the permission a day before it was to be held.
“There has been an abuse of state power and usage of officials in the area,” Arunee said.
It is unclear how much of a discouraging effect such incidents had, but several former Thaksin voters said they had their own reasons for changing their minds.
The emergence of populist, youthful billionaire Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, who promises an end to military “dictatorship,” appears to have drawn votes away from Thaksin. His Future Forward Party came third in Phayao’s constituency with 16,326 votes.
Tai Puttasarn, 45, said she had always voted for Pheu Thai, but this time she voted for Future Forward because Thanathorn is a fresh voice offering a way out of the ruinous cycle of pro and anti-Thaksin protests.
“Choosing Thanathorn felt like when I chose Thaksin in the past. They are both exciting politicians,” she said.
Suteep Thepawong, who sells food for passers-by to feed the fish in the lake, fondly remembers when then-prime minister Thaksin introduced cheap healthcare that improved life in the north.
However, it has been more than 11 years since Thaksin left Thailand to escape a corruption sentence he said was politically motivated and Suteep felt it was time to move on.
“I didn’t vote for Thaksin this time because he is no longer around,” Suteep said. “Thanathorn is here right now.”
There are other explanations for the stronger-than-expected showing of the pro-army Palang Pracharat Party.
Few voters who Reuters interviewed confirmed reports from elsewhere in the north of voter intimidation, but some acknowledged taking money.
One local fisherman said he was paid 500 baht (US$15) to vote for Palang Pracharat’s Thammanat.
“I need to vote for him otherwise it would be dishonest,” the fisherman said. “It would be a sin if I don’t do what I promise. If I accept money, I have to follow through.”
Thammanat denied any vote-buying in his campaign.
Suteep, the fish food seller who switched from Thaksin to Thanathorn, shrugged off the idea that vote-buying affected the results, saying most people just take the money and vote how they like.
However, he said he was impressed by how many people voted for Future Forward even though it did not offer money.
“Palang Pracharat will not get the seat next time,” he said. “I think Future Forward will topple them in the next election.”
Additional reporting by Panarat Thepgumpanat
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.