I have written about Taiwan in opinion pieces in the Taipei Times, and usually enunciated political/social arguments about Taiwanese independence, the two main political parties, identity in Taiwan, threats to Taiwan from abroad, the nation in world affairs, Taiwan’s history, its military, etc. In this piece I would like to step back a bit and compose a more reflective piece (though politics in Taiwan is never far behind). In some senses, this is an “identity” piece, and also a work about Taiwan’s role, character and attributes in world affairs.
Here I am viewing Taiwan from a high level, and from this perspective I am bestowing on Taiwan what I think is a meaningful characterization, which authentically captures the nation’s essence. This is that I see this land, in John Winthrop’s words, as a “city on a hill” in Asia, a beacon of freedom and democracy that speaks to its neighbors and all other nations around the world that “we shall be made a story and a by-word through the world.”
Here and below I will take from Winthrop’s “A Model of Christian Charity” speech to the New England Puritan immigrants he traveled with across the Atlantic in 1630.
The word “city” originates from the Latin for “citizen,” and certainly such a designation is important in Taiwan, with its autonomous and sovereign citizens, ensconced in a free republic. In turn, the picture of the city being “on a hill” denotes a viewpoint and frame of reference (that of Taiwan’s citizens, their attitudes and opinions, their suffrage, their franchise), a prospect and panorama of the autonomous nation.
I warrant that Taiwan can now be viewed as this city on a hill in Asia, and indeed, “the eyes of all people are upon” Taiwan.
I should probably say here, the eyes are not least China’s, which sees Taiwan as this beacon, this light shining in a sometimes benighted part of the world, inspiring people and nations everywhere with its somewhat modest (democracy, plain and simple), but oh so multifaceted polity. Here, in a word, we find that “every man might have need of others, and from hence they might be all knit more nearly together.”
Taiwan has exhibited such binding and attachment to people and countries all over the world, most apparently and creditably in its aid, funding and cooperative work in areas of agriculture; medicine and public health; education; transportation, logistics and construction; “people to people” communications; women’s rights; environmental protection; humanitarian assistance and disaster relief; and technical development. In some respects Taiwan has even treated China this way, such as with the aid to the victims of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, which benefited many people. Additionally, the Taiwan Fellowship provides for research into this area of the world, connection with opinion leaders worldwide, academic relations and internationalization of education, and cultural and public diplomacy. All of these efforts in part focus on China, and its relationship with Taiwan.
In another important way, Taiwan’s multidimensionality is seen in the many people and cultures that live or are educated here. To be sure, foreigners from everywhere are choosing to make Taiwan their home (this writer is a prime example of this), and the multiculturalism that Taiwan evinces, the variety of languages and cultures that are enthusiastically advocated and embraced, are a joy to everyone who makes their domicile here.
These are only some elements of the whole story, and the more important facet is (again) a good bit more “political.” On one hand, as Winthrop said, Taiwan is something of a “community of peril” (in Taiwan we would say “in peril”). Here again the nation must “knit” itself with others, “uphold a familiar commerce together” and disseminate “commission and community ... our community as members of the same body, so shall we keep the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace.”
Here, Taiwan’s own allies are of utmost importance, as are its relationships with the US, Japan, the EU and Australia — and many other smaller nations around the world. Political and military arrangements are vital, as are those “people to people” connections mentioned above, and also economic agreements, which provide sustenance, enable growth, and provide the means for aid and support. In this light, the forthcoming [Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for] Trans-Pacific Partnership is significant, as is cooperation with the APEC nations. These are areas Taiwan must focus on.
Although military cooperation is imperative, Taiwan has, in light of this, much more importantly endeavored in peaceful international collaboration for years, and has never made a single hostile or aggressive move toward any other nation. Some say Winthrop’s words are reminiscent of the Sermon on the Mount, with a focus on benevolence and agreement. In these ways Taiwan seeks to “see much more ... wisdom power goodness and truth,” and to bring these qualities to its friends and neighbors (and even to its enemies, few though they are).
In terms of any “threats” that Taiwan might face in these respects, China is of course at the fore here, and answers have been frustratingly difficult to fashion. At this point, one hopes that we really are family across the Taiwan Strait.
Another angle may be a focus on “pleasures, and profits,” which it is hoped do not distract the nation from its greater good and goals. I think Taiwan has been somewhat guilty in this regard, with a focus on a somewhat mercantile approach to economic growth.
To be sure, the concept of the “city on a hill” is central to American culture and identity. Could the same be true for Taiwan? Why not? Because the truth is that Taiwan is such a hillside city in Asia, an empire of liberty, an exceptional example of a nation with a unique and deep-running historical memory, a “first new nation” (the phrase is from Seymour Martin Lipset) based on liberty, egalitarianism, republicanism, and democracy (and, we should probably add, laissez-faire economics, although this introduces difficulties). Taiwan, be it known — and almost everyone around the world does know this — is an inspiration to freedom-loving people in Asia and the world.
David Pendery is an associate professor at National Taipei University of Business.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry