When Google’s boss sits down with a top US military official on Wednesday, the conversation will likely center on Google’s presence in China — particularly a lab that might be more trouble for the company than it is worth.
Sundar Pichai, chief executive officer of Alphabet’s Google, is to meet in Washington with General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to a person familiar with the situation.
The Internet giant extended the invitation after criticism from Dunford about Google’s artificial intelligence (AI) work in China, which he said “indirectly benefits the Chinese military.”
Illustration: Yusha
Dunford cited an AI lab that Google opened in Beijing in late 2017.
Less than two years later, the small office is causing a massive headache for Google, sitting at the locus of a collision between the company’s global ambitions and the US military’s mounting unease over China’s technical might.
A spokesman for the US Department of Defense confirmed that Dunford is scheduled to meet with a senior Google official this week, but declined to provide further details.
Representatives from Google did not respond to requests for comment.
Google will also brief staff of the US Senate’s Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs today about its work in China and with the Pentagon, according to a spokesman for the committee chairman, US Senator Ron Johnson.
The conflict is a risk to Google’s cloud-computing business, which relies on the company’s AI prowess and is a major source of future revenue growth outside of advertising.
The Pentagon and China are huge potential buyers of Internet-based services, a multibillion-dollar market. Google’s chief rivals in the cloud business, Amazon.com and Microsoft Corp, have aggressively courted both buyers.
However, Google has not. In the past year, the Mountain View, California-based company bowed out of an AI contract with the Pentagon while expanding its search for new businesses in China.
Those simultaneous moves were met with fevered backlash in Washington.
Lawmakers grilled Google about its plans in China and the Pentagon, concerned about China’s national investment in AI technology, has launched a public campaign to shame the company.
Two weeks ago, Google issued a statement saying it “was not working with the Chinese military” after US President Donald Trump criticized the company in a tweet on March 16.
Google withdrew its search engine and most other services from China in 2010, citing censorship concerns, but has maintained advertising sales and software-engineering offices there.
By the time Google opened its Beijing lab, the company had just sealed a deal that underscored its willingness to work with the US military.
In September 2017, Google was awarded portions of a contract for Project Maven, a Pentagon initiative to use image-recognition technology to analyze drone footage, according to a report in Gizmodo.
Two months later, Google announced the Beijing AI center. Like many decisions at the company, this was driven by a desire to hire the best coders. Google has spent the past five years signaling to investors and the public that it is the world’s leading AI company, but it needs talented engineers to maintain this lead.
“AI and its benefits have no borders,” Li Feifei (李飛飛), the Google executive then running the Beijing lab, wrote in a 2017 blog post announcing the center. “And we want to work with the best AI talent, wherever that talent is, to achieve it.”
Technicians in AI are particularly rare and expensive, and many of them are in China.
Li, a Chinese-born computer scientist, cited a statistic that almost half of the research in scientific journals on AI came from Chinese authors.
At the time, Li ran research for Google’s cloud division, and she placed Li Jia (李佳), one of her deputies, in charge of the Beijing center.
Google has since held talks about starting to sell its cloud services in China, Bloomberg News reported in August last year.
So far, the company has mostly given away technology free.
A main focus of Google’s AI lab is supporting TensorFlow, an open-source coding library that lets engineers and companies more easily run AI programs that automate tasks or handle reams of data.
For Google, the tool is a critical way to gain the allegiance of software developers, who might end up paying Google for cloud services later.
Last year, Amazon and Microsoft announced their own AI labs in China. Unlike Google, those two companies already sell cloud services in China. Amazon has even promoted its government work — an Amazon Web Services presentation from last year lists 33 public-sector customers in China.
Amazon and Microsoft have also pursued cloud deals with the US military, while Google retreated from the Maven contract after employee protests.
Some Google engineers even refused to work on an “air gap” security feature last year that would have helped the company compete for sensitive military contracts.
“This is not about me and Google,” Dunford said on March 21 at an event hosted by the Atlantic Council think tank. “This is about us looking at the second and third-order effects of our business ventures in China, Chinese form of government and the impact it’s going to have on the United States’ ability to maintain a competitive military advantage.”
A Pentagon spokesman said that Dunford does not have any meetings planned with other technology companies at this time.
As for Google’s Beijing lab, its founding managers have left. The Web site for the lab describes it as working on education initiatives, “user experience” and the development of Tensorflow.
Just over two weeks ago, the Web site offered another description, according to a version of the page saved by the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine: “We’re developing a world-class research effort dedicated to creating artificial intelligence solutions to real-world problems.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under