Students at two of the nation’s top public universities on Tuesday called for a ban of CtiTV broadcasts on campus, saying the network presents biased news coverage.
The students’ demands are understandable, given that the National Communications Commission levied heavy fines against CtiTV this week for failing to check facts, but the problem is broader than just one network.
The walls of many public spaces today are adorned with TVs, which are often set to news channels. This might be beyond a person’s control in a private establishment, such as a restaurant or cafe, but every news network has a political bias and people in a public facility should not have a bias forced on them.
The bias that a public establishment selects to tune in to is likely rooted in the facility’s underlying party loyalty. Taipei’s public gyms often set their TVs to Global News (寰宇新聞) or other networks that favor the pan-blue camp, likely because the gyms are administered by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-affiliated China Youth Corps.
Broadcasting this bias is unacceptable in gyms run by the municipality, which is there to serve the public good, regardless of a person’s political views. This problem is not unique to Taiwan. In the US, many government-run airports are paid large sums to broadcast CNN, which is considered to favor the US’ Democratic Party.
Governments should do more to stop news networks of whatever political stripe from being broadcast in public spaces. People might think that they can tune out the message and avoid being affected by the bias, but this might not be the case. An eight-year study cited in an article on The Conversation Web site on Sept. 11 last year showed that people might change their behavior based on the political views regularly presented to them.
The results are particularly disquieting when networks are found broadcasting information without checking the facts adequately or presenting certain views with questionable motives. The article said that people could also experience a “spiral of silence,” in which someone might avoid expressing a dissenting opinion that they believe — perhaps wrongly — is in the minority.
The article said that proprietors can contribute to a “false consensus effect,” in which some proprietors might be catering to a viewpoint that they misunderstand to have the general public’s support.
No political view has a general public consensus. There are always people who see things differently, which is why people generally avoid talking about politics and religion in public. It is a healthy democracy that allows networks that cater to various political viewpoints to exist — but those views should never be forced on the public.
In Taiwan, where China’s attempts to influence the public and meddle with the political process are well understood, and in the US, where Russian interference in the previous US presidential election has been alleged, interference should be quashed wherever it occurs.
Taiwan and the US have freedom of the press. Resolving political interference should not mean limiting this freedom, but rather holding the press accountable to a high standard of integrity in their reporting, and keeping public spaces politically neutral by prohibiting news broadcasts or political advertising in those spaces.
At universities, different views are explored and discussed, but the discussion should take place in the context of, for example, political science courses. Students should be free to enjoy school cafeterias and other common areas without having a specific bias forced on them. TVs in public spaces should be free of divisive content.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry