For Turkish firms exporting marble and other stone to an increasingly lucrative Chinese market, the China Xiamen International Stone Fair should have been the business highlight of the year. Instead, the arrest and detention of four Turkish executives for tax evasion sent scores of others fleeing, grabbing any flight they could from mainland China for fear they might be next.
Turkey’s Hurriyet Daily News reported widespread panic among attendees.
One vowed never to return to China, saying he was lucky to find a place on the first plane out.
Illustration: Mountain People
It appeared to be a deliberate and brutal reminder by Beijing of the economic costs of Turkey’s February criticism of China for the treatment of its Muslim Uighur minority.
With a UN panel last year accusing Beijing of interning up to 1 million Uighurs in so-called “re-education camps,” it is a topic many in the rest of the world feel they can no longer quietly ignore.
However, it is also not something most countries — or businesses — want to dominate their relations with a growing superpower. It is a dilemma made even more challenging by Beijing’s apparent complete unwillingness to accept criticism on the issue, coupled with the very real difficulty of knowing what is truly happening to the Uighurs in Xinjiang Province.
Earlier this month, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet made her second request in six months for access to the region — but few believe Beijing has any real intention of allowing a detailed outside investigation. However, those who watch the region closely say things are getting worse.
On March 13, the US made its most overt criticism of Beijing so far on the issue, saying abuses against China’s Muslim minorities were on a scale not “seen since the 1930s.”
Beijing’s campaign of internment against Uighurs, ethnic Kazakhs and other Muslim minorities has intensified significantly over the past year, it said, with numbers now reportedly detained ranging from 800,000 to 2 million, double the upper number estimated by the UN last year.
Another academic estimated the potential number of internees at 1.5 million, about one-sixth of China’s Uighur population.
Speaking at the US Department of State’s annual review of human rights, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that Beijing was now in a “league of its own when it came to abuses.”
However, what is much less clear is how willing Washington is to let these concerns interfere with ongoing trade negotiations with China.
Ultimately, many human rights activists fear the fate of China’s Uighurs could become a strictly secondary concern when pitted against more hard-nosed security and economic considerations.
Foreign business leaders, politicians, journalists and academics all privately express their worries about publicly commenting on the Uighur interments, fearing the loss of access to China on which careers and business models often depend.
The Chinese government allowed selected diplomats and journalists extremely limited access to a camp earlier this year.
Chinese officials say they are “vocational training centers,” with one saying “absurd preachings” by Muslim extremists had turned some in the region into “murderous devils.”
A handful of Chinese Uighurs are believed to have fought for Islamic State and associated groups in Afghanistan, Iraq and beyond, and suspected Islamist militants are believed to be behind a small number of attacks in China, including several 2013-2014 assaults in Beijing, Kunming and Urumqi that killed dozens.
However, none of that comes close to justifying the scale of the clampdown, rights activists say.
Washington has become increasingly outspoken over the Uighurs as its trade dispute with Beijing intensifies, with US officials saying they are considering targeted sanctions against officials involved in the crackdown.
In contrast, European states have remained largely silent.
Last week, a consortium of human rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, criticized what they said were “missed opportunities” to call China out on its abuses.
They called for the European External Action Service to follow Washington in publishing its own frank assessment.
Elsewhere, silence — even outright collaboration in Beijing’s actions — appears to be spreading, an apparent sign of China’s diplomatic and economic clout.
In September last year, Pakistan became one of the first Muslim countries to openly criticize Beijing for the crackdown, saying it risked further worsening extremism.
However, since then it has declined to repeat such views — and Pakistan’s own tiny Uighur population has complained of mounting harassment by authorities.
At the UN Human Rights Council last month, Britain was the only country willing to join Turkey in raising the Uighur issue at all.
Last month, Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman issued an outspoken statement in support of China’s clampdown as he toured China.
Several Muslim countries, including Egypt, have deported visiting Uighur students back to China, apparently under government pressure.
In Kazakhstan, authorities earlier this month arrested a prominent Xinjiang-born activist who had been an outspoken critic of China’s clampdown.
With his own record of oppression against the Kurds and a brutal crackdown following a failed 2016 coup, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is an unexpected champion for an oppressed minority, even given historically strong Uighur-Turkish links.
Perhaps that is why China seems so furious, keen to impose an economic and diplomatic price that would deter other leaders from doing the same.
The awkward truth is that there are serious limits to what the outside world can do to help the Uighurs. Yet that does not mean the debate should be silenced — because a world in which vast numbers can be herded into camps without consequences could become a very dark place indeed.
Peter Apps is a writer on international affairs, globalization, conflict and other issues, and was previously a reporter for Reuters. He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Study of the 21st Century, a non-national, non-partisan, non-ideological think tank. The opinions expressed here are those of the author.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.