The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was not far from drawing its last breath after its defeats in the local elections in November last year. However, after holding on to two seats in traditional DPP strongholds in four legislative by-elections on March 16, the DPP finally found some breathing space.
However, is the DPP’s performance in the legislative by-elections reason to be optimistic about a comeback?
In last year’s elections, voters across the nation gave the party a stern rebuke, and their view of the party’s performance over the past three years was reflected in their support for Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), who addressed their demands in plain language and turned their impatience and discontent with the DPP into a rejection of the party.
If the DPP simply blames last year’s election defeats on the general situation, it would not be able to explain its victories in Taoyuan, Keelung and Hsinchu City, which are traditionally seen as pan-blue strongholds.
The determining factors were clearly the candidates and their management styles, not the general political situation.
Following last year’s election victories, the pan-blue camp tried to leverage the “Han wave” — a surge of support for Han prior to his election — in the legislative by-elections. By duplicating the mass media’s personality cult-building formula, the pan-blue camp was determined to take over Tainan’s second electoral district and New Taipei City’s Sanchong District (三重), which have been DPP support bases for years.
Meanwhile, as the DPP could not afford to lose, government and party officials from every party faction made a successful all-out effort to safeguard the two seats.
Judging from the outcome of the by-elections, which were seen as a prelude to next year’s presidential election, the two camps have returned to a standoff between fundamental support bases.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) had held high hopes that the “Han wave” would sweep across the nation again, but it fizzled out. The DPP, still in shock and lacking self-confidence following last year’s election defeat, finally found its old recipe for getting closer to public opinion and managed to hold on to the two legislative seats in its traditional strongholds.
What now? Will the DPP continue to rule Taiwan relying on slogans and begging for one more chance, while ignoring that the government is unable to understand and satisfy the public’s needs when it comes to policy implementation and legislation?
Or will it drastically reform itself by nominating legislative candidates and top officials with a clean, professional image who are capable of policy integration and implementation, while bravely pushing for generational change in Taiwan to ensure that coming generations remain internationally competitive?
In the confrontation between the pan-blue and pan-green camps’ fundamental support bases, the two will have to find ways to change to find a way out in the presidential election.
The DPP’s values are not to copy the “Han wave” by pretending to be naive and warm, or behave like Internet celebrities and indulge in live-streaming. Rather, the party should resume its past slogan of “honesty, diligence and love for our land.”
From personnel appointments to policy planning, implementation and adjustment and creating a social impact, the party should start to solve the social problems that the nation is facing. The only way to win is to resolutely lead the nation toward democratic and progressive values.
Huang Shih-chieh is a lawyer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry