Rural America needs a new deal, or at least a better deal, and if it is green, all the better.
Farm loan delinquencies are rising to levels not seen since the farm debt crisis of the 1980s, from which the rural Midwest never really recovered. Nearly a third of Iowa farmers growing corn and soybeans caught up in a trade dispute with China are said to be under extreme stress, according to Iowa State University. They are the younger ones.
Rural communities are draining young people. Two-thirds of Iowa’s 99 counties are losing population and prospects as manufacturing jobs leach out of the Midwest. The Information Age jobs are not in those county seat towns of 5,000 people — they are in Minneapolis or Des Moines.
Meanwhile, we are losing our precious topsoil and polluting our rivers — killing the Gulf of Mexico in the process — as we chase ever-higher corn yields in a vain bid to cut a profit on thin commodity markets.
Iowa is losing soil four to five times faster than it can be regrown — yields and crop quality are declining because of it, which ultimately leads to higher food prices with less nutrition.
The Midwest would welcome a New Deal, and this is where it must start.
The Great Plains from Iowa down through Kansas and Texas lead the world in wind energy production. Yet the wind energy production tax credit is set to wane and expire over the next five years.
Those wind turbine royalties are increasingly important in western Kansas, where you can barely raise a corn crop even with irrigation because of soil degradation and warmer nights wrought by climate change. Wind energy technicians who keep the blades whirring are paid good union wages and are welcome residents in tiny Iowa villages. They could ply their trade in West Virginia as well.
Yet they are fought at every turn. Astroturf groups spring up to clamor against new wind farm developments, citing phony “science” of human and fowl health threats, and funded by unknown interests.
They have been able to slow or block development of new production and transmission capacity while new oil pipelines are laid near sacred Native American ground and under the Missouri River without a problem.
Utility companies, while capitalizing on wind revenue, continue to try to squeeze out small farms and businesses from metering their production back into the energy grid. They have been fighting that battle since the late 1980s, when Iowa wrote the first state renewable energy portfolio.
Moreover, our grid is not getting that much smarter, so it can ship wind power when it is needed where it is needed, but remains vulnerable to natural and computer-assisted disaster.
Wind, solar and renewable fuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, have strong appeal in rural areas. While corn-based ethanol presents environmental challenges from growing the feedstock, it presents a pathway to new sustainable fuels production using everything from algae to switchgrass.
A fair deal does not cut out corn growers, but helps them find a new way to live amid a landscape transformed by torrential rains in spring and fall. Farmers are looking at new revenue sources as they have lost money five straight years trying to make a living from eroding commodity markets. New, regional food economies that keep local profits local are just starting to take shape, if only they could find seed money to organize them to survive.
The concentration of food resources in the hands of a few — four firms produce most of the nation’s meat, and two are foreign-owned — can be regulated or even dispersed by finally enforcing the Packers and Stockyards Act, written just before former US president Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal.
However, no attorney general or agriculture secretary has had the political muscle to actually enforce the act that demands open and transparent markets, and guards against exploitation of farmers through contracted production. Moreover, US President Donald Trump’s administration disbanded the Packers and Stockyards Administration enabled by that historic law.
Enforcement could lead to a more diverse food supply network that rewards resiliency in agriculture — and it would be welcomed. However, the reverse is happening on all fronts.
The Conservation Stewardship Program is designed to bring cattle out of unsustainable feedlots and back on to lush grass. It rewards farmers who implement conservation plans and adopt rotational grazing practices that reduce chemical use, capture carbon from the atmosphere and into the soil, and restore soil health through microbial renewal.
Yet the US Congress cut that program’s funding in half in the latest five-year farm bill. The Conservation Reserve Program’s acreage has been cut by a quarter in the past decade for lack of funds. Meanwhile, crop insurance is expanded to cover adventurism as those stressed younger farmers are forced to plant up to the riverbank to make their rent.
A Green New Deal could have cachet in the electorally vital Midwest, which flipped from former US president Barack Obama to Trump, if rural communities knew it was actually for them and not for the utility company or the ethanol traders.
The Great Plains offer the greatest opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by replacing smokestacks with solar arrays and wind turbines. It is happening already — nearly half of Iowa’s electricity is generated by wind, and the region offers the capacity to capture and store deadly carbon if there were an incentive to do so.
Taking corn out of ethanol and converting those hectares to grass for cattle can eliminate nitrate and phosphorous pollution of the Gulf of Mexico, which is destroying the fishing industry from oxygen deprivation in our quest for 200 bushels of corn an acre (0.4 hectares) that the world obviously does not want. We are growing about 30 percent too much corn and soybeans, the markets say.
We can replace lost coal jobs with solar jobs if markets are induced in a carbon trading regime. We can restore rural food processing innovation and good jobs for educated workers if small producers can get a toehold in the market through anti-trust enforcement. All the mechanisms are in place already if we choose to use them, but we do not.
The wind tax credit has to fight for its life every three to five years. The farm bill props up corn production planted in a chemical base controlled by a seed oligopoly, which generates nitrogen gas as harmful to the climate as carbon dioxide.
However, there is a new conversation taking place among old farmers and declining rural communities — that a New Deal is better than a raw deal or no deal at all for rural America. Most of us out here where the tall corn rustles know that change is in the wind. We are getting ready for it because nature ultimately will leave us little alternative.
The question is whether our politics is ready to use tools already at our disposal to save these rural byways, and our planet. We do not have to reinvent the wheel, or even the old New Deal.
Art Cullen is editor of the Storm Lake Times in Iowa and won the 2017 Pulitzer prize for editorial writing.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.