Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政) has proposed amendments to the National Intelligence Services Act (國家情報工作法) with the support of 15 other lawmakers. The proposed changes aim to ensure stiffer penalties for National Security Bureau (NSB) officers found to have leaked state secrets. They would apply to active-duty officers and those within a year of retirement.
Lo said that the changes are necessary to increase the deterrence value of existing legislation.
It is no secret that Chinese espionage activities, aimed at gaining access to confidential military, industrial, technological and political intelligence, is a huge problem for Taiwan. Chinese operatives target not only intelligence agencies, but also visiting officials, Taiwanese businesspeople in China and unwitting targets in Taiwan.
Intelligence leaks from any source, including the bureau, present national security risks. These risks include not only military intelligence and the obvious danger that this entails, but also involve national security issues such as technology theft, and industrial and trade competitiveness.
According to Article 2 of the Organization Act for the National Security Bureau (國家安全局組織法), the bureau and its officers are responsible for Taiwan’s national security, and intelligence gathering and processing operations for Chinese and international intelligence. They are also responsible for analysis of national strategic intelligence and the security of scientific and technological intelligence and communications. A recent addition to the bureau’s structure is a cybersecurity unit, which is responsible for countering cyberattacks and defending networks.
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army is the sole military threat facing Taiwan. Cyberwarfare is increasingly an important aspect of modern warfare. It is widely recognized as playing a potentially decisive role in any conflict between militaries.
Allowing confidential information about Taiwan’s capabilities, planning and systems to be leaked to a hostile country is clearly to be avoided at all costs.
Lo and two cosponsors of the proposal, DPP legislators Chen Ming-wen (陳明文) and Chuang Jui-hsiung (莊瑞雄), two years ago called on the government to revisit a shelved counterintelligence bill. The bill would have implemented an integrated strategy including the Investigation Bureau, military intelligence, police departments and other related organs.
At the time, their concerns were in response to reports that more than 5,000 Chinese spies had infiltrated Taiwan’s military and government, a number that was considered conservative. They had preferred the bill as an alternative to strengthening the National Security Act (國家安全法), but it was rejected by the government due to concerns about giving the state unchecked powers to curtail freedom of speech in the name of upholding national security.
The protection of confidential intelligence is important not simply for safeguarding domestic industrial competitiveness and military secrets, it also has repercussions for Taiwan’s intelligence-sharing relationships with international partners. Taiwan’s intelligence agencies work closely with partners in the US and other countries. Potential leaks and loopholes in the nation’s intelligence agencies would only dissuade international partners from sharing intelligence with Taipei.
As with so many other national security issues, it comes down to finding the correct balance between the security of the state and safeguarding its citizens on the one hand, and guaranteeing freedom of speech and privacy on the other. Current and former NSB officers should be held to a higher standard when it comes to intelligence leaks than ordinary citizens. In view of the importance of reinforcing the deterrence effect of the National Intelligence Services Act, the government should seriously consider the proposed changes.
Over the past few years, migrant workers’ rights have improved in Taiwan, but there has not been a comparable improvement in protections for employers, who are faced with a range of challenges, such as family nurses mistreating patients or workers threatening to change brokers or demanding that employers change their jobs. Then there is the decrease in work standards. Migrant workers too often find the lure of the underground jobs market irresistible, are unaware of employment laws and regulations, or have found that National Immigration Agency (NIA) checks are lax, and as a result abscond. If this happens, what protections or
The Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) has been giving daily COVID-19 updates for almost four months, and on several occasions when major developments have arisen, the news conferences have attracted large numbers of viewers. The entire nation is anxious about the pandemic, and interest in the latest news has become a part of daily life. Watching the center’s daily news conferences has become something of a national ritual. The pandemic has stabilized within Taiwan due to the admirable efforts of each person living in the nation conducting themselves with the utmost responsibility, and in certain cases making considerable sacrifices within their
This year marks the 75th anniversary of the end of World War II. In that war’s aftermath, novelist George Orwell produced two prophetic works. The first, Animal Farm, was published in August 1945; the second, Nineteen Eighty-Four, came out in June 1949. Both still ring true and cover a wide range of messages, including even how the mid-sized nation of Taiwan achieved its democracy and why it still maintains an outlier status in a COVID-19 world. With its full planetary scope, WWII left untold millions dead and injured, cities were destroyed and the future path of most nations was altered. New
United States Senator “Kit” Bond (R-MO) was a real leader on Asia policy during his time in Congress. Like most senators, he had a ready one-liner for every occasion. The one I never tired of hearing is “Well, looks like everything has been said. The problem is not everyone has said it.” It’s sort of like with US-China great power competition. There is not much new to say. This is especially true because it’s largely a story of what’s already happened: BRI, Made in China 2025, aggression in the South China Sea, provocations on the Indian border, cyber-hacks, erosion of “one country,