The next global downturn might still be a little way off. The chances that the North Atlantic as a whole will be in recession one year from now have fallen to about one in four. German growth might well be positive this quarter, while China could rebound, too. And although US growth is definitely slowing — to 1 percent or so this quarter — this might yet turn out to be a blip.
Let us hope so, because if the next downturn is looming, North Atlantic central banks do not have the policy room to fight it effectively.
Should a recession arrive, the US Federal Reserve would ideally be able to cut interest rates by 5 percentage points, as is customary in such situations. However, with short-term safe interest rates at 2.4 percent, it cannot. And with euro and yen interest rates still at about zero, the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan would be unable to help much, either.
Looking ahead, therefore, the big risk is not that inflation will start spiraling upward, with the Fed unable to raise interest rates fast enough to stabilize the economy.
Rather, it is the downside risk that a year from now, the North Atlantic will be in recession, governments will not provide enough fiscal stimulus and the Fed will not be able to reduce interest rates enough — leaving it nearly helpless to even try to stabilize the economy.
The logical response to such an asymmetric risk is — or ought to be — to buy insurance to cover it. However, worryingly, the Fed is not taking out any policy insurance at all against a possible recession, despite having at least three possible options from which to choose.
For starters, the Fed could raise interest rates further now, creating more room for rate cuts if the US economy subsequently falls into recession, but Fed Chair Jerome Powell seems to have ruled out this option for the time being.
In a recent interview, Powell said that the Fed’s policy rate “is in an appropriate place” in view of “muted” US inflation and increasing evidence that the global economy is slowing.
“We’re going to wait and see how those conditions evolve before we make any changes to our interest rate policy,” he said.
Alternatively, the Fed could cut interest rates today to try to compensate for its inability to reduce rates enough in a future downturn. If growth then recovers and strengthens — as more likely than not it will — there is no harm done. US inflation expectations are well anchored, so the Fed could fully and cheaply offset looser monetary policy now with a tighter stance later.
However, if growth does not pick up and the North Atlantic falls into recession, the Fed would have to cut interest rates frantically at the end of this year, and it will greatly regret that it did not get ahead of the curve by pre-emptively lowering rates today.
The Fed’s third option is to leave interest rates unchanged for now, but clearly and aggressively explain how it would fight a recession effectively, should one arrive over the course of the next year. In doing so, the Fed would need to be far more convincing than it was from 2010 onward, when the US economy was struggling to recover from the 2008 financial crisis.
On that occasion, then-Fed chair Ben Bernanke’s monetary policy — and his pleas to Republican lawmakers and austerity hawks to put the national interest ahead of partisan point-scoring and support aggressive fiscal stimulus — were completely ineffective in generating growth above previous trend rates. As a result, the US recovery was anemic and unsatisfactory.
A more credible Fed plan to fight a possible recession next year, in 2021 or thereafter might well boost business confidence and make the central bank’s policies more effective. At the very least, it would reassure companies and investors who, fearing that US aggregate demand will be weak next year, might be starting to pull back.
However, this third option would require an aggressive intellectual and communications effort from the Fed, and there has been no evidence of one.
If the US falls into recession over the next year or two, the Fed might have very little room to loosen policy, and yet, it is not taking any steps to cover that risk. That is unwise.
Unless the Fed buys some recession insurance soon, the US — and the world — might well face much bigger problems later.
J. Bradford DeLong is a professor of economics at the University of California, Berkeley, and a research associate at the US National Bureau of Economic Research. He was deputy assistant US Treasury secretary under former US president Bill Clinton.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.