Wed, Mar 20, 2019 - Page 8 News List

The UN convention against torture

By Pavel Doubek

The Legislative Yuan is adopting legislation on the implementation of two UN human rights documents: The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and its Optional Protocol.

Based on the protocol’s implementation, Taiwan should establish a so-called national preventive mechanism.

This short article aims to briefly introduce the issue and contribute to a public discussion on the mechanism’s mandate and its structure.

Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment represent the gravest crimes against humanity. Such acts that attack the human dignity — core of all human rights and freedoms — are never justifiable whatsoever, whether in a state of war or threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency.

Furthermore, prohibition of torture is one of the basic principles of customary international law.

The absolute and non-derogable nature of torture and other forms of ill-treatment imposes on a state a negative obligation, ie a commitment not to subject any person to torture and second, and a positive obligation to actively protect individuals from torture committed or threatened by other persons.

To meet these obligations, a state should adopt a variety of measures as made clear in Article 2 of the convention: “Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction.”

The convention was adopted by the UN General Assembly and entered into force on June 26, 1987, and to this day, it has been ratified by 165 states.

In 2006, the international community reached the conviction that further measures were necessary in order to achieve the purposes of the convention and to strengthen the protection of persons deprived of their liberty against torture and other forms of ill-treatment.

Thus an important stage in torture prevention has been made, when the protocol entered into force and created a unique system of protection of persons restricted in their liberty by the cooperation of two monitoring bodies: the UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture, and the mechanism.

While the convention is a framework that imposes on a state a variety of negative and positive obligations, the protocol’s focus is narrower, as it requires the establishment of a preventive system of regular visits to places of detention by the mechanism as an independent expert watchdog.

The protocol stresses that preventing torture is a long-term continuous commitment that necessitates a constructive dialogue and close cooperation between the state or state actors, the mechanism and the subcommittee.

To date, the protocol has 89 state parties, of which 71 have already established their mechanisms.

The subcommittee stresses that a state has the freedom to decide whether it creates a completely new mechanism body, designates an existing institution, nominates a single institution or creates a multi-body model.

Thus, there exist eight different mechanism types among the 71 countries reflecting their particular political, social and historical background.

Nevertheless, the most common model is where the mechanism mandate is devoted to an ombudsman, or public defender of rights.

However, it should be stressed that designating an existing institution with the mechanism mandate does not mean that a state meets the protocol’s obligation to create a fully functioning mechanism. This is just the first step and a variety of legislative and structural changes must follow.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top