The recent airstrikes traded between India and Pakistan were triggered by a suicide bomb attack on Feb. 14 that killed 44 Indian security personnel in Pulwama in Indian Kashmir. The Pakistan-based terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) claimed responsibility for the attack.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who, according to Japanese and Indian media reports wanted to visit India this month — he might not be able to do so because of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s preoccupation with the Indian elections in May — would have faced considerable distrust and skepticism in India about China’s attitude toward terrorism.
Besides the three-month-long Doklam stand-off in the summer of 2017 between Indian and Chinese soldiers — which started when China began constructing a road into the Doklam plateau close to the tri-junction border between India, Bhutan and China — India is upset that China continues to shield Masood Azhar, who heads the JeM, at the UN.
Many international experts say that China, by shielding Azhar, is siding with terrorism.
China has blocked efforts by the remaining UN Security Council members to designate Azhar as an international terrorist.
The JeM has been involved in a number of terror attacks in India, including on the Indian Parliament, Pathankot Air Force Station, an army base in Uri and security forces in Pulwama, which nearly brought nuclear-armed India and Pakistan to war.
If Xi wants to have a long-term friendly relationship with India and also dispel any doubts that China does not support terrorism, he will have to start by not only defusing border tensions with India, but also stopping Pakistan from allowing terrorist activities against India to be launched from its soil.
Pakistan has done little to curb activities by JeM as well as another terror group, Lashkar-e-Taiba, headed by Hafeez Syed, who is already a UN-designated global terrorist whose capture is worth a US$10 million bounty from the US government.
China ought to remember that the world’s formerly most-wanted terrorist, Osama bin Laden, found sanctuary in Pakistan.
Attempts in the past by India and other permanent UN Security Council members such as France, the UK and the US, to get Azhar designated as a global terrorist were blocked by Chinese vetoes.
However, a determined France, having experienced the pain of terrorism on its own soil, is taking the lead to have Azhar designated as a global terrorist after China blocked an earlier attempt.
France and other council members hope that China will not block the move this time. After all, the 15 permanent and non-permanent members, including China, on Feb. 21 unanimously passed a resolution, condemning in the “strongest terms” the “heinous and cowardly” terror attack in Pulwama perpetrated by Pakistan-based JeM; the resolution’s language was widely seen as reflecting India’s handwriting.
China’s international image could be seriously dented if it appears to shield a known terrorist. After all, China has its own share of problems with Pakistan, where religious extremists have criticized the treatment of Muslim Uighurs in China’s Xinjiang Province.
While China uses terrorism in Xinjiang to justify its crackdown on the Uighur population, its behavior at the UN in regard to Azhar repudiates its professed aim to combat terrorism.
There is another factor that could hurt China if it continues to rub India the wrong way. Facing economic slowdown and difficulties in traditional export markets in the West, China is eyeing India’s huge market. China-India trade, currently at US$85 billion, has considerable growth potential.
Some experts say that if the two sides were to aggressively push trade, two-way volume could reach US$250 billion in a few years.
China’s trade and economic ties with India could be badly hit if China persists in its behavior at the UN and continues to shield Azhar.
Chinese diplomats in India have noticed a surge in public anger and frustration among Indians over Beijing’s behavior not only toward India, but also toward its smaller neighbors in the South China Sea.
Belt and Road Initiative projects in the Pakistan-controlled Gilgit-Baltistan region, which India claims as part of Kashmir, have also generated considerable resentment against Chinese hegemony. In this emotionally charged environment, it is not surprising that many Indians want to see ties with Taiwan upgraded and strengthened.
In his next bilateral summit meeting with India, Xi will have to go on a charm offensive and remove irritations to win India over, with the US also courting New Delhi.
“We are tired of hearing platitudes from the Chinese, and hope China will not block the combined international attempts to designate Masood Azhar as an international terrorist,” a senior Indian government official told me on condition of anonymity.
Xi is also concerned about the growing strategic cooperation between the US and India. China sees it as a way to thwart its ambitions in the South China Sea and, by extension, in the Indian Ocean.
If it does not want India to be locked in the US’ embrace, China needs to change its behavior. It can start by not blocking the council’s attempt to get Azhar designated as a global terrorist.
Manik Mehta is a New York-based journalist with extensive writing experience on foreign affairs, diplomacy, global economics and international trade.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations