Every minute, on average, 31 people are displaced — forced to leave their jobs, homes and even their families. These refugees often arrive, after arduous journeys, in new countries with no money or identification, and few possessions.
Yet, far from securing a safer, more prosperous future, they often find themselves marginalized, excluded and even demonized, denied opportunities to integrate into their host societies or contribute to the local economy.
One straightforward way to empower refugees is to give them access to financial services.
Financial services providers have long neglected this population, owing to accessibility and identification challenges, together with perceptions of refugees as a high-risk group.
However, technological advances in the past decade have made providing financial services to refugees easier, safer and more cost-effective than ever.
Thanks to digital and mobile technologies, banking no longer happens primarily in brick-and-mortar branches, but rather on people’s phones, wherever they are. This has facilitated the rise of digital wallets that enable users to receive, store and spend money using only their phones.
In the past few years, mobile money has become wildly popular in sub-Saharan Africa in particular, and it can be a game changer for the world’s massive unbanked population — 1.7 billion people — two-thirds of whom already own a mobile phone that could act as a gateway to financial services.
There is little reason to distinguish refugees from the rest of the world’s unbanked. Contrary to popular belief, refugees are not a higher-risk demographic: The Kiva World Refugee Fund Impact Report found that, when it comes to loan repayment, refugees are on par with non-refugees.
Moreover, thanks to facial recognition and artificial intelligence technologies, banks can now instantly verify users’ identities, using, for example, a quick iris scan run through an open-source identity verification application programming interface (API).
As a result, refugees’ lack of an identity card, loan collateral and/or a fixed address is becoming irrelevant. This is likely to be all the more true with the introduction of ID2020, a collaboration among Microsoft, Accenture and the UN that will use biometric data and blockchain — distributed ledgers — to create an encrypted, permanent and shareable means of identification for all refugees.
It is in the interest of financial services providers themselves to make use of blockchain. True, the technology — which facilitates direct transactions among parties, creating a permanent and immutable record — has the potential to displace financial services providers in the long term, by ending their monopoly on intermediating trust.
Yet, in the short term, its adoption by banks could slash costs and reduce the risk of fraud, thereby enabling the rapid expansion of services to refugees, among others. In this sense, blockchain could revolutionize credit access for refugees.
Already, blockchain is being used to help refugees. For example, in Jordan, the Zaatari refugee camp distributes humanitarian aid using blockchain and cryptocurrency. Each refugee is issued a digital wallet, into which money for food and supplies is deposited, with facial recognition being used to verify transactions.
The results have been compelling: fair and accurate aid distribution, a 98 percent reduction in transaction fees and fewer cases of misappropriation of funds.
In Finland, MONI, a blockchain start-up, and the Finnish Immigration Service have issued refugees a digital identification stored using blockchain. With a MONI account, refugees can access government benefits, even if they have lost their passports. Such uses of blockchain reduce reliance on government-issued identification, as they encourage the acceptance of other forms, such as a UN-issued refugee identity document.
There is another, long-term rationale for financial services providers to expand services to refugees. Doing so would allow them to collect data and learn valuable lessons that can help shape their approach to increasingly mobile global customers, who are shifting from full-time jobs to remote and freelance work in the “gig economy.”
The creditworthiness of freelancers — expected to represent 43 percent of the workforce by 2020 — can be difficult to determine, owing to their irregular and unpredictable incomes. So-called digital nomads also often lack a permanent address, making it difficult to conduct credit checks.
Thus, these workers of the future raise many of the same challenges for traditional financial services that refugees do. Alternative credit-scoring methods that are created for refugees today could be applied much more widely in the future.
Given all of this, banks should act now to expand their services to refugees. They could follow the example of the financial technology (fintech) company MyBucks, which has already opened a banking branch in Malawi’s Dzaleka refugee camp to provide loans, mobile banking and training services.
Of course, resolving the refugee crisis and tapping the economic potential of the more than 25 million refugees worldwide would also require changes in other areas, beginning with destination country political narratives. In many countries, politicians and the media have been portraying refugees as a threat to security, cultural cohesion and public resources.
Former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton blamed her loss to Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election, and the Brexit vote that preceded it, on the public backlash against immigration, and recently suggested that Europe should admit fewer refugees to stem the rise of populism.
The German Chancellor’s Personal Representative for Africa, Gunter Nooke, had an even more unpalatable proposal: African countries should cede land to be administered by the EU as special economic zones, in what would amount to “voluntary colonialism.”
Such solutions are not only unethical; they would not end the crisis. Humanitarian aid alone will not work either, except as a stopgap measure. To preserve long-term stability and dynamism, host countries must unlock economic opportunities for refugees. Financial services providers and fintech companies, known for their capacity for disruption, can play a key role in that process.
Jacqueline Musiitwa, a 2014 Aspen New Voices fellow, is a regulatory attorney and an inclusive finance specialist in Uganda.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.