The Ministry of Transportation and Communications has announced a summer travel subsidy program, following on from its “warm winter” promotions, subsidizing travel to locations in Taiwan to the tune of about NT$30 billion (US$970.6 million). It is spending another NT$8 billion on subsidizing taxi upgrades. The government keeps pulling all this money out of its hat as election sweeteners.
Given the budgets being submitted by local governments following the changing of the guard in most of them after the local elections in November last year, it seems the new mayors and county commissioners have worked out that the proverbial cupboard is quite bare.
With this comes the distinct possibility that many of the checks they signed with their campaign promises will bounce. This is perhaps the reason behind the Changhua County Government declining to take responsibility for hosting next year’s Taiwan Lantern Festival, for which it elicited appropriate ire from the online commentariat.
Government finances are a constant headache at the central and local government levels, especially over the past few years. Local governments have been offering sweeteners, such as welfare initiatives for elderly people or child subsidies, and it could be said that the trend is on the rise.
In the case of Taichung, for example, residents have had the provision of free bus services, which did not come with a sunset clause from the beginning, and which — due mainly to election considerations, no doubt — have even been expanded, further eating away at the local government’s limited resources.
Another example is free entry to the Taichung World Flora Exposition, which has now been extended to all Taichung residents.
Governments at all levels have at their disposal ways to expand their sources of income, while finding new ways to economize on expenditures. The central government can rely on state-owned enterprises to turn on the income tap, but local governments have long had to rely on borrowing, selling off land or securing subsidies from the central government to pay for administrative commitments or commission construction projects.
Perfectly valid and legal policies to boost finances have one after the other been snatched away by elected representatives; welfare is provided universally, even to the well-off who do not need it; and sometimes tax is not collected from those who should rightly pay.
One of the clearest examples of this is the waiver of payments for the use of cremation facilities, initially offered as an incentive for people in the proximity of the funeral parlor, but extended by local councilors to all city residents. The local government will lose hundreds of millions of New Taiwan dollars every year for this reason alone.
Over the past 20 years, local governments have been vying with each other for a larger piece of the fiscal pie under the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) or for more leeway to borrow according to the provisions in the Public Debt Act (公共債務法).
However, if one were to look at the local governments’ self-governance regulations, one would be hard pressed to find any regulations on sourcing income or economizing on expenditures, which is why it is so difficult to achieve and why local governments continue to fritter away money.
Is it any wonder that local city and county governments’ coffers are drying up?
Chang Kuo-hui is a former Taichung city councilor and former director of the Taichung Civil Affairs Bureau.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry