The Ministry of Transportation and Communications has announced a summer travel subsidy program, following on from its “warm winter” promotions, subsidizing travel to locations in Taiwan to the tune of about NT$30 billion (US$970.6 million). It is spending another NT$8 billion on subsidizing taxi upgrades. The government keeps pulling all this money out of its hat as election sweeteners.
Given the budgets being submitted by local governments following the changing of the guard in most of them after the local elections in November last year, it seems the new mayors and county commissioners have worked out that the proverbial cupboard is quite bare.
With this comes the distinct possibility that many of the checks they signed with their campaign promises will bounce. This is perhaps the reason behind the Changhua County Government declining to take responsibility for hosting next year’s Taiwan Lantern Festival, for which it elicited appropriate ire from the online commentariat.
Government finances are a constant headache at the central and local government levels, especially over the past few years. Local governments have been offering sweeteners, such as welfare initiatives for elderly people or child subsidies, and it could be said that the trend is on the rise.
In the case of Taichung, for example, residents have had the provision of free bus services, which did not come with a sunset clause from the beginning, and which — due mainly to election considerations, no doubt — have even been expanded, further eating away at the local government’s limited resources.
Another example is free entry to the Taichung World Flora Exposition, which has now been extended to all Taichung residents.
Governments at all levels have at their disposal ways to expand their sources of income, while finding new ways to economize on expenditures. The central government can rely on state-owned enterprises to turn on the income tap, but local governments have long had to rely on borrowing, selling off land or securing subsidies from the central government to pay for administrative commitments or commission construction projects.
Perfectly valid and legal policies to boost finances have one after the other been snatched away by elected representatives; welfare is provided universally, even to the well-off who do not need it; and sometimes tax is not collected from those who should rightly pay.
One of the clearest examples of this is the waiver of payments for the use of cremation facilities, initially offered as an incentive for people in the proximity of the funeral parlor, but extended by local councilors to all city residents. The local government will lose hundreds of millions of New Taiwan dollars every year for this reason alone.
Over the past 20 years, local governments have been vying with each other for a larger piece of the fiscal pie under the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) or for more leeway to borrow according to the provisions in the Public Debt Act (公共債務法).
However, if one were to look at the local governments’ self-governance regulations, one would be hard pressed to find any regulations on sourcing income or economizing on expenditures, which is why it is so difficult to achieve and why local governments continue to fritter away money.
Is it any wonder that local city and county governments’ coffers are drying up?
Chang Kuo-hui is a former Taichung city councilor and former director of the Taichung Civil Affairs Bureau.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under