On Wednesday last week, the Washington Post published a letter by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), in which he said that President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) “takes a confrontational approach by not recognizing the 1992 consensus between Taipei and Beijing, namely ‘one China, respective interpretations’ ... harming Taiwan’s economy and diplomatic relations.”
“Given the fierce competition between the United States and mainland China lately, the people of Taiwan are increasingly worried that Taiwan may be used as a bargaining chip in the process,” Ma wrote.
“Taiwan’s detente with mainland China during my administration is clearly in the US interest,” he added.
On the same day, the newspaper published another letter by Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US Deputy Representative Louis M. Huang.
Huang said that “China’s ambitions and intentions do not involve only Taiwan,” but also pose threats to the entire Asia-Pacific region’s stability, showing that the “global engagement and peaceful transformation policy toward China has proved to be a failure.”
Accordingly, Huang expressed the hope that “like-minded countries will stand up together to an authoritarian regime bullying its neighbors and its own people.”
After all, China’s target “may be Taiwan or Xinjiang today, but who will it be tomorrow?” he wrote.
Comparing the two letters, one cannot help but wonder: How could Ma — a former president, who repeatedly receiving a low approval rating during his term in office — justify himself as being a candid representative of “the people of Taiwan” and point the finger at the incumbent Taiwanese president through a foreign media outlet?
Second, in a speech delivered on Jan. 2 to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan,” Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) clearly said that the so-called “1992 consensus” means that “both sides of the Strait belong to one China and will work jointly to seek national unification on the ‘one China’ principle.”
On March 2, Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Yang (汪洋) did not even mention the “1992 consensus” in his report at the annual conference.
Instead, he stressed China’s “firm opposition to Taiwan independence” and Beijing’s determination to facilitate unification.
In other words, Ma’s prolonged obsession with “the 1992 consensus,” as if he still had the option of having “different interpretations,” is simply delusional.
Third, the basic tone of Ma’s opinion is: Not surrendering to Beijing’s conditions is tantamount to taking a confrontational approach, which will bring harm to Taiwan.
How can Ma’s logic, which places the blame on the victim, help Taiwan gain more international support? The better way would be calling for empathy from Japan, the Philippines, Vietnam, India and other nations, urging them to support Taiwan and collaborate to counter Chinese bullying.
How about reminding the international community that temporary leniency is likely to lead to a greater evil eventually devouring countries of shared interests?
Interestingly, the Washington Post decided to publish both Ma and Huang’s letters on the same day in parallel, showing a balanced presentation.
While one cannot fathom the real reason behind the choice — whether it was purely coincidental or the newspaper did not want to buy into Ma’s perspective — Taiwanese media outlets in comparison showed an apparent lack of professionalism by largely overlooking Huang’s letter.
Faced with the imminent threat from China, Taiwan does not have much time to consolidate its people. Meanwhile, disingenuous arguments, as Ma’s letter shows, only foster the enemy from within.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.