Just more than a week ago, Thailand’s army chief began trending on Twitter.
It started with an order, made by General Apirat Kongsompong that 160 radio stations across the nation must play the 1970s anti-communist propaganda song Nuk Paen Din (“Scum of the Earth”), which glorifies the might of the armed forces, on a daily basis.
The social media backlash was almost instantaneous. The military was lambasted for being archaic, out of touch and trying to use Cold War tactics to brainwash the public and influence the outcome of the general election on March 24.
Illustration: Mountain People
Less than three hours after Apirat, who is also secretary-general of the military government, became a trending topic, the order was rescinded.
The reversal— unprecedented in a system where criticism of the junta is usually met by prosecution, not compromise — was an indicator of the increasing power that social media is having in Thai politics.
In the five years since it took power in a coup, the junta has retained an iron grip on traditional media in Thailand, ensuring newspapers and television unfailingly promote its agenda. Those who dared to criticize were often prosecuted under the draconian computer crimes law.
The narrative propagated in media was one of stability and prosperity — a world away from the reality of a stagnant economy and oppression that has defined military rule.
However, recently, there has been a shift, accentuated by the upcoming election. The last official election in Thailand was in 2011, when social media use was not as widespread. Now, at least 74 percent of Thais are active on some form of social media and are among the heaviest internet users in the world.
Thailand has more than 49 million Facebook users, making it the eighth-biggest user of the platform in the world. It is here, not in the state-restricted media, that large sections of the population are getting their political news and analysis.
“It is a real source of hope to me that through social media, particularly Facebook, but also Twitter and YouTube, ordinary citizens have built themselves up into influential political commentators, voicing ideas and criticisms of the junta that traditional media would never dare, and they have absolutely huge followings,” said Pravit Rojanaphruk, a renowned Thai journalist who was detained by the junta in 2015 for an online post.
Pravit said that an increasing number of dissenting political voices on social media had even emboldened traditional media to be more critical of the military government, encouraging them “to push the limits of press freedom, which we are seeing play out in real time in this election.”
It was a similar case with the vehemently anti-military rap song, Which Is My Country, which confronted the corruption, nepotism, violence and the suppression of free speech in Thailand under the junta.
The government threatened the group, Rap Against Dictatorship, with prosecution under the computer crimes law, but after the song went viral, racking up 58 million views, it proved impossible to stop it being shared and the authorities backed down.
The military, which set up its own pro-junta party, is aiming to hold on to power after the election, but “social media has the potential to sway this election out of the military’s control,” Pravit said.
The election will see 7.4 million first-time voters eligible to go to the polls, accounting for more than 10 percent of the electorate. They are not so heavily polarized down the lines of pro-democracy red shirts and pro-monarchy yellow shirts, which have defined Thai politics over the past decade and could prove crucial to the result.
According to a recent survey of potential first-time voters by Bangkok University, 79 percent said they would vote and 86 percent said they were using social media as their source of election information.
Social media plays a complicated role in Thai politics, serving as both a democratizing platform to elevate the voices of the oppressed and opposition figures, but is also increasingly responsible for the spread of fake news and smear campaigns against political figures on all sides.
The party that has best harnessed social media and is targeting those first-time voters is the newly formed Future Forward party, led by millionaire businessman Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit.
While Future Forward is small compared with the political heavyweights and has a much more radical agenda, it has the fastest-growing momentum.
Thanathorn, one of the most outspoken junta critics, has also become something of a social media phenomenon. Having earned the nickname “daddy,” after a handsome businessman character in popular Thai soap Dok Som Sithong, the hashtag #skylovesdaddy — the character’s signature line used to seduce his love interest — has repeatedly trended on Twitter over the past month as an affectionate reference to the Future Forward leader.
He now has more than 400,000 Facebook followers.
“This upcoming election will be the first time in this country that social media shows its potential,” Thanathorn said. “Look at our party, social media has been a big part of our momentum because we can gain access to millions of people with very little cost.”
Certainly the military government has done its best to exercise heavy control over social media ahead of the election. The election commission introduced draconian restrictions on its use in campaigning and established a so called “e-war room” to monitor candidates’ behavior online.
Thanathorn has also been directly targeted by the commission for social media posts and is facing possible prosecution or disqualification from the election for a post criticizing the junta, which he said was simply an “obvious attempt to discredit our party”.
Now, his deputy, Pongsakorn Rodchompoo, faces a policy inquiry after briefly sharing a fake news article that accused a top junta official of buying cups of coffee for 12,000 baht (US$377) each. He took it down on further investigation.
Last week also saw the junta push through a stringent new cybersecurity law, which gives the government unprecedented powers to access online data and arrest people without a warrant for computer crimes, and further censor content online, seen as an indicator of their increasing paranoia over online dissent.
Nonetheless, Thanathorn believes the schism brought about by social media is here to stay.
“Previous political calculus cannot be used in this election because we are talking about millions of people gaining information from sources out of government control, gaining a voice to be critical and entering the ballot more informed,” he said.
“The junta is losing the battle to control social media and it could change everything,” he added.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations