China’s diplomats are not being very diplomatic.
In the past few months, its envoy to Canada publicly accused his hosts of “white supremacy,” its ambassador in Sweden labeled the Swedish police “inhumane” and blasted the country’s “so-called freedom of expression,” and its chief emissary in South Africa said that US President Donald Trump’s policies were making the US “the enemy of the whole world.”
“I don’t think we are witnessing a pattern of misstatements and slips of the tongue,” said Ryan Hass, a fellow at the Brookings Institution who previously oversaw China affairs at the US National Security Council. “We seem to be watching China’s diplomats matching the mood of the moment in Beijing. Beijing rewards diplomats that are aggressive advocates of China’s views and scorns those that it perceives as overly timid.”
That might be damaging Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) efforts to win friends abroad and capitalize on Trump’s international unpopularity. While China has seized on the trade war and US disengagement abroad to pitch itself as a champion of globalization, 63 percent of respondents to a Pew poll in 25 countries last year said they preferred the US as a world leader, compared with 19 percent for China.
At stake is China’s avowed goal of establishing itself as a global superpower with influence over a network of allies to balance US influence. China is pouring billions into global efforts such as Xi’s Belt and Road Initiative to forge stronger links with countries around the world.
However, China’s increasingly strident diplomatic approach could do more harm than good. Anti-China sentiment has played a pivotal role in election surprises across Asia and more countries around the world are becoming skeptical of Chinese investment — particularly in telecommunications, with fears growing about using its equipment in 5G networks due to concerns about espionage.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not respond to faxed questions about the more aggressive language from diplomats.
After Trump took office, China has sought to portray itself as a supporter of the international order, with Xi himself defending globalization at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. His charm offensive stood in contrast to Trump, who has reshaped public discourse with regular insults of other world leaders on Twitter.
Even so, foreign diplomats in Beijing say that the behavior of Chinese officials has become far more aggressive and assertive in private meetings in recent years.
Their discussions have become more ideological, according to one senior foreign envoy, who described the behavior as a strong sense of grievance combined with increasing entitlement about China’s international role and rights.
China’s reported behavior at the APEC summit in November last year highlighted the shift.
Papua New Guinea police were called after Chinese officials attempted to “barge” into the office of the country’s foreign minister to influence the summit’s communique, according to the Agence France-Presse news agency.
Chinese officials later denied the report, calling it “a rumor spread by some people with a hidden agenda.”
Chinese diplomats’ advocacy for the country’s embattled tech giant, Huawei Technologies Co, has even riled heads of government. After the Chinese ambassador to the Czech Republic, Zhang Jianmin (張建敏), announced in November last year that the Czech cybersecurity body’s decision to ban Huawei did not represent the view of the Czech government, Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis said: “I do not know what the ambassador is talking about,” according to Czech Radio.
One European ambassador in Beijing said China’s aggressive advocacy for the company has been prevalent across the 28-nation bloc.
In some regions, China’s overseas rhetoric has been hardening for years. Foreign officials noticed an increasingly strident tone from Beijing following the global financial crisis. At a 2010 meeting hosted by Southeast Asian nations in Hanoi, Vietnam, then-Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) famously dismissed some of China’s neighbors as “small countries” when challenged over Beijing’s stance in the South China Sea.
Foreign diplomats said the outbursts have increased in both frequency and intensity since Xi took power in 2012. In the past few years, South Korea, the Philippines, Australia and now Canada have all incurred Beijing’s wrath, with diplomatic barbs often accompanied by economic pressure through import restrictions, store inspections and safety warnings to Chinese tour groups.
In a speech at the 2017 Chinese Communist Party conclave that saw Xi appointed for a second term as party chief without an apparent successor, Xi described China as “standing tall and firm in the East” and pledged to make the country a global leader in innovation, influence and military might.
At a conference for Chinese ambassadors at the end of that year, Xi urged diplomats to play a more proactive part in an increasingly multipolar world — a speech that China’s ambassador to the UK described as a “mobilization order,” or “bugle call.”
China’s diplomatic corps has been quick to show its loyalty to Xi. In a 2017 essay in the party’s theoretical magazine Qiushi (求是), Yang pledged to study and implement Xi’s thought on diplomacy in a “deep-going way.”
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) recently praised Xi for “taking the front line of history” and “braving 10,000 crags and torrents.”
“Chinese ambassadors always feel they have to speak to the leaders in Beijing more than to the local public. Their promotions depend on it,” said Susan Shirk, a former US deputy assistant secretary of state for East Asia. “If today what they say is more overtly anti-American or anti-Western, then that reflects the changing foreign policy line.”
Last month, the former deputy head of the party’s powerful Organization Department, Qi Yu (齊玉), was appointed as the foreign ministry’s party secretary, despite a lack of diplomatic experience.
One foreign envoy said Chinese diplomats are skilled and smart, but also increasingly “scared.”
China has seen this kind of ideology-driven diplomacy before. During the Cultural Revolution, Chinese diplomats in London videotaped themselves fighting protesters on the streets of London, according to the book China’s Quest by historian John Garver.
In Beijing, British and Soviet diplomatic missions were besieged or invaded and other diplomats were threatened on the streets.
The new wave of truculence is also affecting how foreign envoys are treated in China. Detained Canadian citizen and former diplomat Michael Kovrig has been questioned about his work as a diplomat, according to people familiar with the discussions.
The move might be a violation of Article 39 of the Vienna Convention, which explicitly covers the past work of former diplomats. China is a signatory.
Foreign diplomats visiting China’s far western region of Xinjiang have been followed, temporarily detained and forced to delete photographs from their phones, while Swedish citizen Gui Minhai (桂民海) was grabbed by Chinese authorities in front of Swedish diplomats, according to the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The shift in mood, and tensions with the US, have altered the tone of discussions inside China’s bureaucracy.
One Chinese trade diplomat said that while it has never been easy to be a dove in China, all but the most senior officials now refrain from publicly voicing moderate positions toward the US.
“Beijing has established a pattern of making examples of middle powers in hopes that doing so deters others from challenging China’s interests,” Hass said. “Some in Beijing also seem to be growing frustrated that China’s rising national power is not yet translating into the types of deference from others that it seeks.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry