Attitudes about peace
In politics, even though you are doing something for the right reasons, you might still need to figure out what attitude to adopt to get the public on your side. There is no room for complacency — people will not follow you just because you think you are right.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has floated the idea of signing a peace agreement between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait — an idea that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) consistently opposes.
Although the DPP has legitimate reasons for its opposition, if it adopts the wrong attitude in response, it could easily give the public the impression that it is hostile to China and is going out of its way to create tension across the Strait.
To avoid giving the public this impression, the DPP should respond with a benevolent attitude by saying that the two sides of the Strait are willing to engage in negotiations to sign a peace agreement out of respect for each other’s sovereignty, treating each other as equals and supporting each other’s interests — and that the door to peace will always be wide open.
Of course, we know that even if China were to sign a peace agreement, it would not respect the text of that agreement, so any such pact would give Taiwan no guarantees to speak of.
However, we can be even more certain that if the two sides want to sign a peace agreement, Beijing would certainly force Taiwan to accept as a precondition the “one China” principle, meaning that both sides of the Strait belong to “one China” and a “one country, two systems” arrangement.
When making preliminary statements, the Taiwan side could highlight China’s overbearing attitude — how if Taiwan does not capitulate and become part of China, there is nothing else to negotiate about.
By exposing China’s arrogance, the DPP can get the public to clearly understand the KMT’s capitulationist attitude. That would be the right way to get the public on the DPP’s side.
If Taiwan really moved toward signing a peace agreement with China, the US would be worried that its China-friendly position would tip it all the way over in China’s direction. To prevent secrets about advanced weapons technology from being leaked to China, the US is likely to stop selling arms to Taiwan.
Taiwan would then find it difficult to go on improving its defense capabilities. It would gradually sink into a relatively weak and disadvantaged position, making it easier for China to force it to surrender.
To prevent such an unfortunate outcome, the DPP, while responding to calls for the two sides of the Strait to sign a peace agreement, should use available channels to explain to the US government that the purpose of this political give-and-take is to break down the “united front” strategy being pushed by the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party — and that even though the DPP might concede some points, it will not really act on them.
Chen Kuo-hsiung
Taichung
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs