The Directorate-General of Highways has said that it plans to add interactive situational awareness videos to scooter and motorcycle license tests. This is a small step in the right direction, as the number of fatalities in road accidents remains high, and the majority of accidents involve scooters and motorcycles.
National Police Agency statistics show that the number of vehicular accidents continues to increase. In 2009, there were 160,879 reported cases, which included 2,092 fatalities. The number of cases peaked in 2014, with 307,842, although the death toll fell to 1,819. The 2017 figure of 296,826 cases remained disconcertingly high.
The fatality figure records only “A1” category deaths: those that occur on the spot or within 24 hours of an accident. The agency statistics do not include the “A2” category — the number of fatalities 24 hours or more after an accident — so the real number of deaths is higher.
The agency’s statistics for causes and casualties of traffic accidents for 2017 give a slightly lower number of A1 fatalities — 1,434 — but the overwhelming majority of these — 1,358 — are classed as being due to driver error.
By type of vehicle, of the 296,826 cases in 2017, 91,762 involved private passenger cars, while 155,669 — more than half — were motorcycles.
This figure certainly suggests that it is right to target drivers of scooters and motorcycles with the interactive road awareness tests, but it is not the whole story.
Road awareness is not simply about alertness or reaction times. It is also about anticipating what could possibly happen through the ability to read the road and experience.
It is about knowing when to use patience and caution to ensure that one’s actions do not cause a potentially dangerous situation, and how to judge the amount of time required to execute a certain maneuver in such a way that does not oblige another road user to change course or decelerate to avoid an accident.
It also involves not just being able to anticipate other’s actions, but also understanding how one’s own actions might be anticipated by others.
Too many times drivers in Taiwan attempt to enter a stream of traffic without first looking behind them or checking their rear-view mirrors, assuming that drivers behind them would slow down or change lanes to accommodate their entry.
A driver poking the nose of their vehicle into the stream of traffic, anticipating a gap in which to move, or initiating a move out of a parking space on the roadside, could cause scooters behind them to assume that they are actually moving out, forcing them to brake abruptly or change lane. This could cause accidents, even when the motorcyclist is not at fault.
The fact that scooters are disproportionately represented in the accident figures does not mean the problem of insufficient road awareness lies with scooter drivers alone. Accidents are caused by the impatience, selfishness and lack of road awareness of drivers of other vehicles, too — it is just that scooters are less stable and their riders are more vulnerable when an accident occurs.
However, the real problem lies in the nation’s driving culture as a whole. The video initiative will not improve the road awareness of drivers who already have their licenses, and new drivers are likely to absorb the unofficial rules of the road embedded in the driving culture soon after they obtain their licenses.
Initiatives to educate children about road awareness and stricter license testing with an increased emphasis on situational awareness must go hand-in-hand with other programs to educate current drivers about reading the road.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations