Any Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians still harboring the misconception that they have the same definition as China of the so-called “1992 consensus” need look no further than recent statements from Chinese officials and academics to wake up from their self-delusion.
“The KMT over the past years has distorted the original meaning of the consensus by defining it as both sides acknowledging there is ‘one China,’ with each side having its own interpretation of what ‘China’ means. Such an explanation has deviated from the ‘one China’ principle,” Wang Zaixi (王在希), former deputy director of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) and current vice chairman of the Beijing-based National Society of Taiwan Studies, told a forum on Tuesday last week.
“Acknowledging there is ‘one China’ without seeking unification is not the ‘1992 consensus,’” he added.
The next day, TAO spokesman An Fengshan (安峰山) echoed Wang’s remarks, telling a news conference that “adhering to the ‘one China’ principle and jointly striving for national unification is the proper definition of the ‘1992 consensus.’”
Can Beijing make it any clearer for consensus believers that the KMT’s definition was a complete fabrication?
During eight years in office, former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration based its entire cross-strait policy on the fictional “consensus.”
At the time, Chinese authorities — in an effort to curtail Taiwan’s pro-localization movement and fulfill their wish that a China-friendly Ma would steer the nation toward their “one China” goal — happily played along with Ma’s deception and refrained from publicly pointing out how different his definition was from theirs.
Wang’s and An’s remarks merely underscore the truth: The “consensus” has never existed.
In a Jan. 2 speech, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stressed this truth when he said that “both sides of the Strait belong to one China, both are to strive for national unification — and that is the 1992 consensus.”
As early as July 2017, China’s Xinhua news agency exposed Ma’s lies about any “consensus” when it published guidelines banning Chinese media from using “Republic of China (ROC)” and Ma’s interpretation of the “1992 consensus.”
In short, Beijing has clearly eliminated any gray area between its “one China” principle and the “1992 consensus.”
When Xi proposed a “one country, two systems” framework for Taiwan in his speech, many senior pan-blue politicians, including KMT Legislator Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) — a great-grandson of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) — voiced their opposition.
Beijing has confirmed that it does not agree with the KMT’s definition of the “1992 consensus,” nor with “China” being interpreted as the ROC, so the KMT should stop lying to itself and to Taiwanese by saying that Chinese authorities agree to let both sides of the Taiwan Strait interpret “one China” in their own way.
Anyone still clamoring for Taiwan to accept the imaginary “consensus” — be they pan-blue grassroots supporters or KMT presidential hopefuls — is simply promoting Beijing’s political agenda, which aims to wipe the ROC off the map and annex Taiwan under the “one China” principle.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs