Militaries must prepare now to deal with more frequent disasters, new conflicts and other risks as accelerating climate change brings threats that could draw in troops at home and abroad, military and defense officials have said.
“The threats are real. We already see them. And the threats will grow as the temperature rises,” said James Clayden of the Dutch Ministry of Defense, speaking at a conference on climate change and security at the Hague, Netherlands, last week.
About 1,000 Dutch troops, for instance, were called out for a month to provide humanitarian help and security when powerful Hurricane Irma slammed into Sint Maarten, a Caribbean island that is part of the Netherlands, in 2017.
That was manageable — but as hurricane disasters become more frequent and devastating, as warming oceans spur larger storms, the pressures on military resources will grow, as will the costs, Clayden said.
Jane Neilson, a senior policy analyst for the New Zealand Ministry of Defense, said her country’s military forces regularly turn out to help South Pacific island neighbors hit by disasters.
However, New Zealand officials worry that the country’s relatively small forces could struggle to cope with bigger, harsher and more frequent disasters, or the threat of several crises happening at once.
“Our worst nightmare” is another big earthquake hitting New Zealand just as a Category 5 hurricane hits the South Pacific, she said.
“Globally, militaries are going to be more stretched with operations deriving from climate-induced impacts,” she said, calling climate change “the single greatest threat to the security, livelihoods and well-being of people of the Pacific.”
For many nations, threats at home are also growing.
The Hague sits 3m below sea level, protected by a system of dikes and pumping stations, said retired general Tom Middendorp, a former Dutch defense chief.
Dutch forces already spend about 25 percent of their efforts supporting civil authorities, including by protecting the anti-flood systems, Middendorp said.
However, if sea level rises significantly — by 1m or more by the turn of the century, under some scenarios — “imagine the impact it could have. The military needs to be ready for that,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
“It’s crucial in any country that the civil responders and military sit together and do risk analysis, see how they will cope in an emergency and translate that into standing arrangements,” Middendorp said.
In the US, such preparations have been difficult, despite worsening floods, wildfires and storms, because US President Donald Trump’s administration has been reluctant to accept climate change as a risk, military officials said.
The White House is readying a presidential panel that would question US military and intelligence reports showing human-driven climate change poses risks to national security.
However, retired US Navy rear admiral Ann Phillips, who sits on the advisory board of the US-based Center for Climate and Security, said that climate threats — including to the country’s military facilities — are clear, and the forces are already addressing them.
That includes preparing bases for expected sea level rise and providing better flooding protections, as well as working to cut emissions from military operations.
“We are moving forward on this issue. We are being impacted by it and we can’t deny it,” she said, pointing to bases on the US’ eastern and Gulf coasts already hard hit by floods and storms.
Middendorp said it is key for countries to understand that it will not be only poorer and more vulnerable nations hard hit by climate change.
“It will affect all countries with a coastline, all islands. Countries that up until now have been very peaceful will now be in harm’s way,” he said.
He urged politicians to put aside political divides to tackle the increasingly evident risks.
“Climate change was always a left-wing issue and security was a right-wing, hard-liner issue. We were completely different worlds — but we’ve learned to appreciate each other,” Middendorp said.
Now, looking at both issues together is “of essential importance to everyone, regardless of your political background. We should de-politicize this,” he said.
Climate change threatens to drive violence and conflict that could spill over borders or draw in other countries as it brings worsening food and water shortages, more migration and other pressures, Middendorp said.
Clayden pointed to Egypt, which he said would face losses of land to sea level rise and growing water security threats in an already fragile political climate.
“What will happen there? We don’t know. But are we already preparing to take measures? No, we’re not. We as a ministry of defense are reacting to the problems of today, which for us is Venezuela,” he said.
“We know it’s a problem, we know it will impact on the security situation, but we are not tackling it,” Clayden said.
Middendorp said he saw similar risks in a range of places, particularly Africa and the Middle East, “where big rivers are drying out, the population is increasing, demand is piling up and we can’t supply them with water and food.”
Some of the countries “also have poor governments, internal tensions, poor security,” he said. “This fuels tension, drives migration flows, creates grounds for terrorists and extremism.”
Azzam Alwash, the Iraqi founder and chief executive officer of Nature Iraq, which has advised on restoration of the country’s southern marshes, said that rising population in his country, combined with collapsing agriculture as droughts worsen and uncertain oil revenue, meant migration to Europe was likely to surge.
“If you think 2016-2017, where you had waves of migrants coming up, was bad, wait until 2030. That’s just around the corner,” he said.
When it comes to climate security risks, “it’s time states wake up,” Alwash said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with