The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) never stops trying to win over Taiwanese. It is using a carrot-and-stick approach and political propaganda to divide the nation by executing its “united front” strategy, making concessions to Taiwan and promoting unification.
After many years of this approach, it is easy to see that the drastically different political systems on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are a crucial obstacle to exchanges and the cause for the widening gulf between the two sides.
The Republic of China (ROC) has for many years been suppressed in the international arena by the CCP and militarily speaking, it is under constant threat, which only confirms that the CCP has never considered that the ROC is a democracy, but has only been steering toward annexation.
However, from another perspective, the CCP is but a government and it is not the same as China. The crux of the matter is that the CCP is completely incapable of facing up to the existence of the ROC. The CCP’s violations of the ROC’s sovereignty and forcing Taiwan to accept the CCP’s unilateral political claims can only have a negative impact on cross-strait interaction.
The CCP is increasing its pressure toward unification, but despite its statements that it has an urgent timetable for political unification with Taiwan and its clearly growing sense of urgency, whether the CCP is trying to divide Taiwan or set a trap, it must understand what the public wants and how firm Taiwanese are in their beliefs to prevent a strategic misjudgment.
The CCP has relied on economic concessions to build support among the public, in combination with sharp power to infiltrate and divide society. In doing so, it is engaging in asymmetric warfare by using the openness of Taiwan’s democratic society.
If the CCP wants to break open the cross-strait “status quo,” it must change its mindset and stop forcing any kind of political framework on Taiwan.
For a democracy, handling bilateral conflict normally involves compromise rather than a violent approach. Whether China will be able to transform itself into a liberal democracy will depend on whether it will initiate democratization.
One of the core concepts of liberal democracy is that the government is but a means, that the goal is the realization of individual values, and that each person’s rights and interests should be protected by peaceful means.
Viewing this from the perspective of idealist and empiricist tradition, the global trend is toward liberal democracy. This means that the choice of future cross-strait interactions lies with Taiwan rather than China.
Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework is a 40-year-old cliche that has deprived the Chinese of the opportunity to choose liberal democracy.
The ROC on Taiwan is a democratic success story. The main intersection point between Taiwan and the rest of the world is its liberal democratic society and political system, and the values maintained by the vitality of its democracy.
International society is once again considering the use of international organizations — including the UN, IMF, WHO, WTO and various regional organizations — to resolve the difficulties faced by global society.
In the wake of rapid globalization, the lines of sovereignty are becoming blurred and not even national borders are as clear as they once were.
The ROC is on the right side of history and it should continue to use its considerable political, economic and military strength to safeguard the operations and permanence of its democracy, and vigorously defend national sustainability and prosperity.
Chang Yan-ting is an adjunct professor at National Defense University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this