When US President Donald Trump sits down to talk peace with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un later this month, one of the US’ closest allies — Japan — will be looking on with apprehension.
Like the first time Trump met Kim in June last year, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has found himself on the outside peering in before their second summit set for Wednesday and Thursday next week in Hanoi.
The meeting brings both the promise of a less-dangerous North Korea and the potential peril of a weak deal that leaves Japan exposed to Kim’s weapons of mass destruction and does nothing to help ease Tokyo’s own hostility with Pyongyang.
Mitoji Yabunaka, who served as Japan’s envoy to six-party talks with North Korea more than a decade ago, said the country feared “a half-baked, deceptive agreement which leads to the Trump administration taking a soft line on North Korea by removing economic sanctions” without serious progress on disarmament.
That would be “the nightmare scenario,” Yabunaka said.
While Japan and the US — which guarantees the country’s security under a 1960 treaty — both want North Korea to give up its weapons, their interests could diverge as talks progress.
Kim’s short to medium-range rockets pose the most immediate danger to Japan, not the intercontinental ballistic missiles that now threaten the US homeland.
Moreover, Trump’s unilateral decision to grant Kim’s request to suspend joint military exercises with South Korea during their first summit has raised concerns about a potential US pull-back after the second. The presence of about 28,500 US troops on the peninsula provides Japan a valuable buffer against a rising China, as well as North Korea.
“We want the US forces to remain in South Korea for as long as possible,” said Rui Matsukawa, a diplomat-turned lawmaker with Abe’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party. “Japan must keep reminding the US of what it needs from the US-North Korea deal.”
North Korea fired two missiles over Japan and tested others that landed in the country’s exclusive economic zone as tensions between Washington and Pyongyang rose in 2017.
However, Tokyo has been largely shut out of the subsequent thaw, with North Korean state media still churning out screeds denouncing the Japanese as “island barbarians, the sworn enemy of the Korean people” and other insults.
Meanwhile, Abe’s efforts to build a personal rapport with Trump — even recommending him for the Nobel Peace Prize, according to the US president — have shown their limits. Trump has accused Japan of falling short on troop payments, he has withdrawn from a shared Pacific trade pact and imposed tariffs on the country’s metals exports on “national security” grounds.
Japan was also forced to accept bilateral trade talks with the US after Trump threatened similar tariffs on its vital auto industry.
The US Department of Commerce on Sunday said that it turned over its report on vehicle imports to Trump, without offering any insights into the findings.
“Our advantage up until now has been the strong personal relationship between the leaders,” said Motohiro Ono, a former parliamentary secretary for defense and lawmaker for Japan’s Democratic Party For The People. “It doesn’t look as though we can use it now.”
There have been no calls or meetings between Trump and Abe since Nov. 30 last year, according to the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs Web site. By contrast, they met twice and spoke by telephone five times in the three months leading up to the first Trump-Kim summit in June last year, including calls the day before and the day of the meeting.
Japan plans to invite Trump in May so he can be the first state leader to meet the country’s new emperor, the Sankei Shimbun said. The visit will include a golf excursion with Abe, the newspaper said, citing unidentified people familiar with the bilateral relationship.
In parliament on Monday, Abe praised Trump for acting “decisively toward resolving the issues of the North Korean nuclear and missile problems,” while declining to say whether he nominated the US leader for the Nobel Prize.
Earlier this month, Abe told lawmakers that he wanted to speak to Trump before the summit.
“I want to coordinate our policies on the nuclear, missile and — most important of all for our country — abduction problems,” Abe said, according to the Sankei Shimbun.
Japan has long sought US support for the return of a dozen of its citizens believed kidnapped and taken to North Korea in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
Although Trump and US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo have pledged to help, the issue has not featured prominently in US-North Korea talks.
Abe has urged Trump to maintain a hard line on international sanctions against North Korea, including by clamping down on suspected transfers of fuel to its ships at sea, to push for a deal that includes shorter range missiles.
Many of North Korea’s shorter range missiles are capable of carrying weapons of mass destruction, but experts are not sure what sort of warheads the secretive state can affix to the missiles.
Former lead South Korean nuclear negotiator Chun Yung-woo — one of the few people who helped broker a deal that temporarily rolled back North Korea’s nuclear program — said that Japan and his own country share an interest in making sure the regime gives up all its fissile material.
“Just eliminating intercontinental ballistic missiles could be perceived as a US-first policy at the expense of Japan and the Republic of Korea,” Chun said in an interview. “That would be very bad. Japan has to make sure that denuclearization doesn’t end there.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry