President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has confirmed that she is to seek re-election.
Despite the bruising defeat the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) suffered in the local elections in November last year, followed by her stepping down as party chairperson, criticism within the DPP and calls not to seek another term from independence advocates, Tsai said she is confident of her prospects.
Fears of a defeat for the DPP in next year’s presidential election are legitimate, as the alternative — a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) victory — would be calamitous for Taiwan, in the sense of its continued existence as a sovereign nation, as opposed to its demotion to a province of China that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) erroneously insists that it is.
Given the increasing pressure and rhetoric from Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the groundwork laid by the previous KMT administration led by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), there is a strong case to argue that this presidential election will be more consequential than previous ones.
Xi and the CCP insist upon acceptance of the so-called “1992 consensus” and the “one China” principle as prerequisites for cross-strait negotiations. The KMT’s acquiescence to this prerequisite, and Tsai’s refusal to accept the “1992 consensus,” are pivotal to the direction in which cross-strait relations will go following the election.
An article published in a pro-Beijing Chinese-language media outlet announcing Tsai’s confirmation of her decision to stand for a second term was titled: “Tsai to seek re-election, despite Beijing’s opposition.” That was met with outrage from certain quarters, including DPP Legislator Wang Ding-yu (王定宇) who questioned, in a Facebook post, when Taiwan started caring about Beijing’s approval of the nation’s president.
Former KMT chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) has already declared his intention to vie for the KMT nomination for president, as has Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中). Chang favors seeking a peace treaty with Beijing, based upon “one China, with each side having its own constitutional government,” and has said that it would be quite natural to explore the option of unification.
KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has said he would announce his decision before July. Regardless, as chairman, he has already talked about signing a peace treaty with China, an idea first broached by Ma, with whom Wu previously served as vice president.
Political commentator Wu Tsu-chia (吳子嘉) has suggested that Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), still riding the “Han tide” that swept him to power in November, would seek the KMT presidential nomination. Given his popularity, especially compared with Tsai’s, that would be a formidable proposition. However, comparing an incumbent president midway through their first term and a political rookie at the beginning of theirs is a risky thing to do in politics.
On Sunday night, Han criticized Tsai in a Facebook post, calling into question her mental faculties for “abandoning the China market” and reiterating that the “1992 consensus” is the “magic wand” of cross-strait relations.
If Tsai rejected the “1992 consensus” and the Republic of China, but held back on declaring independence for the country, “I would ask her in which direction the country is to go,” Han said.
It is a good question, as far as it goes. The answer is: an independent, sovereign democracy can go wherever it wants.
The question also confirms Han’s view of Taiwan’s future, which is one that diverges little from the KMT’s pro-China mindset.
The local elections should be viewed as a mid-term scorecard on the government’s performance, not an indication of the direction the electorate would like to see Taiwan go. Tsai’s refusal to accept the “1992 consensus,” in the face of the prodigious pressure exerted on her by the CCP, makes her the right person to take Taiwan forward.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs