For over a decade now, we have witnessed more elections and, simultaneously, less democracy. According to Bloomberg, elections have been occurring more frequently around the world. Yet Freedom House found that 110 countries have experienced declines in political and civil rights over the past 13 years.
As democracy declines, so does our sense of community. In the US, this is evidenced by a looming loneliness epidemic and the rapid disappearance of civic institutions such as churches, eight of which close every day. Though these trends are global in nature, the US exemplifies them in the extreme.
This is no coincidence. As Alexis de Tocqueville pointed out in the 1830s, the US’ founders envisioned a country governed not by shared values, but by self-interest. That vision has since defined the US’ institutions, and fostered a hyper-individualistic society.
A few years ago, when I was launching Spark MicroGrants in East Africa, I watched a group of US students from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology meet with about 50 residents of a Rwandan village who were hoping to convince the Rwandan government to contribute to a project to extend an electricity line to their community (which, to their credit, they eventually did).
One student grilled a community member about why the government, rather than the residents, should pay for the project.
The student was channeling a typically US idea of privatization and access based on individual purchasing power, but that idea can corrode collective and civic engagement, and it seems to be undermining political trust as well.
According to the Pew Research Center, the share of Americans who trust the government dropped by a 55 percentage points between 1958 and 2017, and now sits below 20 percent. Not surprisingly, engagement has also dropped in the same period, with involvement in civic associations falling by half.
Growing distrust in governing institutions has fueled a rise in authoritarian populist movements around the world. Citizens are demanding individual economic security and retreating into an isolationist mentality.
In the 2016 US presidential election, US Senator Bernie Sanders and businessman Donald Trump appealed to an overlapping bloc of voters who are fed up with “the system,” and second and third-generation immigrants turned against newer immigrants.
In countries ranging from Germany to Brazil, voters have flocked to far-right parties not out of love for the candidates, but out of fear of losing power and status.
Yet we know that “user engagement” works, as shown by countless studies and human experiences. For example, in Uganda, an evaluation showed that the more citizens participated in the design of health programs, the more the perception of the healthcare system improved. Direct citizen involvement in the Indonesian government decisionmaking led to higher satisfaction with government services.
By creating more opportunities to engage in civic and political life, we can strengthen trust in our institutions and stem extremism.
Today, though, engagement happens in fits and starts related to political campaigns and policies, such as then US-senator Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign or the Tea Party movement that emerged to oppose him.
After mass shootings, protests in favor of gun-control laws increase, but after a short while, the National Rifle Association exploits fears of government overreach to encourage engagement in the other direction.
Achieving genuine engagement, rather than reacting to issues that are presented by politicians or circumstances, requires new institutions that overcome the barriers to effective civic participation and community-driven change.
While the Western world suffers from over-individualization, the most notable governance and economic innovations are taking place in the global south.
The Rwandan government has introduced policies to encourage grassroots solutions that strengthen citizens’ sense of community and shared accountability. Through monthly community-service meetings, families and individuals work together to build homes for the needy, fix roads and pool funds to invest in better farming practices and equipment.
Imagine if more than 300 million Americans convened every month for a similar purpose. There would be billions more citizen hours invested in neighbor-to-neighbor interaction and citizen action.
This was one of the main effects of the Village Savings and Loan Associations that originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Members have access to loans to start small businesses and save for a rainy day. The model works because it leverages neighbor-to-neighbor accountability.
Likewise, from Haiti to Liberia and beyond, community-based health systems have proven effective precisely because health workers know their neighbors and their needs. Community health workers go from home to home, checking in on pregnant mothers and making sure they are cared for.
Each of these solutions uses and strengthens communal accountability through shared engagement.
If we believe in the democratic principle that governments must be accountable to citizens, we should build systems that hold us accountable to each other — and we must engage beyond elections and protests.
We must usher in a new era of community-driven democracy — power must be decentralized and placed in communities. When we achieve community-driven democracy, we will engage with one another and with our governments, not just on special occasions, but because our democracy and freedom depend on us.
Sasha Fisher, an inaugural Obama Foundation fellow, is the founder of Spark MicroGrants.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs