Unlike its usual prompt response to US officials’ and congressional members’ show of support for Taiwan, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration has reacted with restraint and discretion to calls by a group of US Republican senators for Tsai to visit Washington and address the US Congress.
Such a step would no doubt be a high point in Taiwan-US relations since the two nations severed diplomatic ties in 1979. The question is, would it be worth the backlash that it would certainly engender from China?
When the idea of inviting Tsai to address the US Congress was first proposed early last month by Joseph Bosco, former China country director in the office of the US secretary of defense, in an opinion piece published in the The Hill, former American Institute in Taiwan director William Stanton — who has been a firm Taiwan supporter — was quick to question the benefits of such a move.
“If we are going to provoke China, it should be [for something] of lasting importance to Taiwan. I think that is the view of many people,” Stanton said.
He also urged Tsai to carefully weigh the pros and cons of such a visit.
Stanton made a good point. While such a visit would send a strong signal to the world that Taiwan and the US are closer than ever, the benefits would mostly be symbolic.
By contrast, it makes more sense to risk upsetting Beijing over the signing of a free-trade agreement between Taipei and Washington — an idea that has been thrown around a lot since late last year, including by Stanton at a forum in Taipei in December — as the economic benefits Taiwan could gain from the deal would most likely outweigh the potential retaliation from an angry China.
However, it does not mean that moves that are mostly symbolic are not worthwhile and should be avoided altogether. The majority of supportive measures taken by US officials and congressional members since 1979 are largely symbolic and have yet to translate into actual progress in bilateral relations.
For example, expectations were high when the Taiwan Travel Act, which encourages mutual visits by high-level Taiwanese and US officials, was signed into law in March last year, but they faded quickly after the public realized that the act is more recommendatory rather than mandatory, and that the US officials who visited Taiwan since then are similar in ranking to those who visited before the act’s enactment.
Although the lack of actual progress over the years has upset many who are hoping that closer Taiwan-US ties could help elevate Taiwan’s international status, it is risky to let emotions take over in the current political climate.
Sometimes symbolic moves are all that can be done and while they do not always translate into actual change, they nonetheless indicate a strong bilateral willingness to improve ties.
As Ministry of Foreign Affairs Department of North American Affairs Director-General Vincent Yao (姚金祥) said at a news conference on Tuesday, while it is his ultimate goal to see high-level US and Taiwanese officials visit each other freely and without restrictions, it is unlikely at the moment and that is why he has to deal with the issue with pragmatism.
Improving ties takes time and patience, especially for an unrecognized country that is up against a giant, unpredictable neighbor.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs