Tue, Feb 12, 2019 - Page 9 News List

For Putin, economic reality dampens appetite for arms race

By Andrew Osborn  /  Reuters, MOSCOW

With his ratings down and state funds needed to hedge against new Western sanctions and raise living standards, Russian President Vladimir Putin cannot afford to get sucked into a costly nuclear arms race with the US.

Alleging Russian violations, Washington this month said that it was suspending its obligations under the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) and starting the process of quitting it, untying its hands to develop new missiles.

That raises the prospect of a new arms race between Washington and Moscow, which denies flouting the treaty.

Putin responded by saying Russia would mirror the US moves by suspending its own obligations and quitting the pact.

However, Putin, who has sometimes used bellicose rhetoric to talk up Russia’s standoff with the West and to rally Russians around the flag, did not up the ante.

He did not announce new missile deployments, said that money for new systems must come from existing budget funds and declared that Moscow would not deploy new land-based missiles in Europe or elsewhere unless Washington did so first.

“We must not and will not let ourselves be drawn into an expensive arms race,” Putin told Russian Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu.

His statement was born of necessity.

Harsh economic and political realities and memories of how the cost of the Cold War arms race contributed to the Soviet Union’s demise means Putin’s options are limited, a situation that might curb his appetite for escalation.

That does not mean Putin is not still spending heavily on the military. He last year unveiled an array of new weapons, which he billed as world-beating, including a hypersonic missile, a laser weapon, an underwater nuclear drone and a nuclear-powered cruise missile.

However, his ability to bankroll a full-on arms race is limited.

“We need to keep in mind that the question of an arms race that could cut us into pieces is entirely realistic,” former Russian central bank governor Sergei Dubinin told Russia’s RBC TV channel before Washington announced its exit.

He said that the US was trying to repeat its successful Cold War strategy of pushing Moscow into an arms race it could not afford and that Russia would be ill-advised to try to attain parity and needed a smart response instead.

Memories of empty supermarket shelves in the run-up to the 1991 Soviet collapse still haunt many older Russians as the then-Soviet Union directed huge cash flows to the military-industrial complex to try to keep up with the US while neglecting the consumer economy.

“They [the Americans] recall that the Soviet Union collapsed in part because it tried to keep up with the United States when it came to who produced more missiles, nuclear submarines and tanks,” military expert Viktor Litovkin told the Russian army’s Zvezda TV channel.

“They are trying to do the same thing today,” he added.

With the INF treaty suspended, Washington and Moscow have said they will develop previously prohibited short and intermediate-range land-based missiles, with Russia saying it wants them ready by 2021.

Shoigu told Putin the money to develop two new land-based missile launchers would come from this year’s budget by reallocating existing funds.

Russia does not disclose the full extent of its military and national security spending, but said it would account for about 30 percent of its 18 trillion ruble (US$273 billion) budget this year.

This story has been viewed 1780 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top