While attending a Lunar New Year banquet for veteran entertainers on Tuesday last week, former singer Lisa Cheng (鄭心儀) slapped Minister of Culture Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君) because she disagreed with her policy of transforming the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall and support for transitional justice.
Interestingly, this incident happened just as Cheng was talking to actor Chen Sung-young (陳松勇), who played Lin Wen-heung (林文雄), the eldest son of the Lin family, in the film A City of Sadness (悲情城市), for which he won the Best Leading Actor award at the 26th Taipei Golden Horse Film Festival in 1989, and which became one of his most famous roles.
Director Hou Hsiao-hsien’s (侯孝賢) film was released 30 years ago this year. As well as being honored with the Golden Lion award for best film at the Venice Film Festival, the movie also brought renewed prosperity to its setting — the picturesque town of Jiufen (九份) in the mountains of what is now New Taipei City.
However, the aspect of the film that drew the most attention was that it tackled the sensitive subject of the 228 Incident in 1947.
The film is set when Japan’s colonial rule of Taiwan had just come to an end and the Republic of China’s nationalist government had taken over.
With the tribulations of the Lin family as its central narrative, the film reflects the ways in which Taiwanese reacted to the “return to the motherland,” with hopeful expectation turning into disappointment, anger and frustration. It touches upon matters such as widespread searches, arrests, torture and “forced disappearances.”
Transitional justice is a way for states to compensate for the illegalities and injustices of the past.
The question of the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall is just one small part of transitional justice in Taiwan, which includes many other issues and processes.
Last year, the government announced two batches of cancelations of guilty verdicts from the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) authoritarian period, thus restoring the reputations of 2,775 victims of political persecution.
Other tasks include opening political files, eliminating the remnants of authoritarianism and conducting investigations into ill-gotten party assets.
All of these fall within the scope of transitional justice, and all have come under fire from the KMT. As transitional justice treads on the toes of vested interests, it can easily provoke backlashes when put into practice.
Due to Taiwan’s complex historical and political background, transitional justice tends to be strongly associated with unification versus independence, and with issues among different communities. This often creates additional obstacles.
Taiwan went through 38 years of martial law and “White Terror,” and more cases of injustice keep emerging.
These cases involve people from every community, including those from various Chinese provinces, as well as Taiwan. “Mainlanders” form a larger proportion of the victims than they do of the general population.
The repression of those years sent many people to their deaths, while countless others lost their security and freedom.
Taiwan’s road to democracy has been very bumpy, and we are only beginning to confront historical mistakes.
Vague opposition to the removal of positive references and symbols to do with Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) is a straw-man argument. We should not allow it to misrepresent the overall core values of transitional justice.
Huang Yan-cheng is a political science major at Soochow University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with