From tariffs to tyrants, the nations of Latin America do not often see the world the same way. So the gathering outcry over the accelerating emergency in Venezuela, followed by recognition that enfeebled Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro must go, stands out.
Only a handful of left-wing leaders dissented when countries across the Americas dropped the customary indulge-thy-neighbor diplomacy to recognize National Assembly President Juan Guaido as temporary Venezuelan president.
Dubious honors to Bolivian President Evo Morales who declared solidarity with Maduro and decried the “claws of imperialism” that would yank him from power.
That lonely howl says a good deal about the shifting political mood in Latin America, where leftist national leadership is being washed away by a rising and still transforming political tide from the right.
Discontents see this wave as a recrudescence from an authoritarian past, when Latin America was the object of superpower avarice and designs. The new blue tide has many banners, from aggressive evangelical Christian conservatism to disruptive capitalism, but the Venezuelan crisis suggests the broader change owes less to a new Cold War than a collapse of governability.
“This shift is in response to the management failure of the populist left in Latin American governments,” said political analyst Fernando Schuler, who teaches at the Sao Paulo business school Insper. “If redemocratization strengthened the left’s hold on politics, academia and the bureaucracy, now it’s the mainstream, pro-market agenda that has gathered strength.”
How Venezuela’s political calamity will end — a dictatorial backlash, civil war, Maduro fleeing to exile — is anyone’s guess. The larger riddle may prove to be how to restore order and prosperity to the shambolic economy.
This is where Venezuelan democrats, notwithstanding the formidable economic talent the opposition leaders have on speed dial, ought to take their cues from the accident-prone political reboot playing out across the Americas.
Latin America, after all, is the bane of governmental dream teams, as even the region’s functioning democracies have discovered. Argentina is a ward of the IMF, the transformative financial wizards Argentine President Mauricio Macri brought to office have long since cashiered.
Former Peruvian president Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, once the toast of Wall Street, fell to a corruption scandal, while Brazil’s alpha economists saw their ambitious policy makeover aborted and even their successful reforms eclipsed by former Brazilian president Michel Temer’s disgraced exit.
The “new Brazil” his successor, Jair Bolsonaro, flogged last week at the World Economic Forum — leaner government, lower taxes and a war on corruption — augurs well for a region hobbled by protectionism and government overreach. All these initiatives signal that Brazil too has taken a turn to the political right.
Just what sort of right wing will predominate in the region is a more difficult call. There is a lot of ideological daylight between the God, guns and no-quarter-for-criminals rant Bolsonaro fed to his conservative base during the campaign, and the free-market pieties he recited from the teleprompter in Davos, Switzerland. And no one knows what policies will drive Venezuela’s opposition if they come to office.
The distance is considerable between Bolsonarismo and the more shape-shifting conservatism of his neighbors. Consider Chilean President Sebastian Pinera, a former credit card tycoon, whose political tin ear and early faith in market solutions collided with public fury and nearly crippled his embattled first term.
Elected for another term in late 2017, he pivoted to the center and has calibrated his belief in open markets to embrace socially liberal banners such as gender rights, protection for LGBT people and indigenous groups, and tough new fines for environmental violations.
The view gets murkier still from Argentina, where the pro-business independent Macri was elected to rescue the economy from the miscreant populism of former Argentine president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, only to find that his fiscal gradualism pleased neither the nation’s investors and business elite nor the general public frustrated by a chimeric recovery.
And how to peg Colombian President Ivan Duque, a protege of the angry rightwing former president Alvaro Uribe, but far closer in sensibility to the more conciliatory centrism of his maligned and somewhat feckless predecessor, Juan Manuel Santos?
“If this is a blue tide, there are many shades,” Schuler said. “Instead of a prevailing tone, we are likely to see many gradations coexisting in the region.”
Matias Spektor, a professor of international relations at the Getulio Vargas Foundation in Sao Paulo, draws a line between two claques of the political right competing for ascendancy in Brazil that could be stretched across the region.
One is the global right, which defends the rule of law, democratic institutions, and greater liberties for both markets and individuals. Think Pinera, Duque, Macri and perhaps Peruvian President Martin Vizcarra.
They stand in sharp relief to the woolly populist conservatism of Bolsonaro and, say, Paraguayan President Mario Abdo Benitez, a staunch pro-business champion who opposes same-sex marriage and decriminalizing abortion.
If there is a common skein to the many strands of the new right, it is an appreciation that balanced budgets can also be good politics. Encomiums to fiscal temperance are not new, but the recent consensus grew out of collective disappointment over classic Latin American boom and bust economics.
Nowhere is the failure more abject than in Venezuela, the once marquee oil producer which has seen its output more than halved under the chaos of Bolivarian economics.
Most Latin American nations have scrapped or are in the process of undoing the expansionary economic policies they eagerly adopted during the world financial crisis. Years of public overspending drove El Salvador’s right and left to sign on to fiscal conservatism, though financial analysts expect that ardor might flag as this year’s presidential race approaches.
“There’s a growing perception that economic stability and governability matter, and that these are the metrics that are going to strengthen your credit profile,” said Aristodimos Iliopulos, a Latin America analyst with Barclays Investment Bank. “There’s been a huge shift to fiscal responsibility laws in large and small countries.”
It is not that Latin America’s conservatives suddenly have become paladins of sound economics. Look no further than Bolsonaro, who spent nearly three decades in the legislature decrying privatization and boosting state interventionism.
In Davos, thankfully, Bolsonaro ditched the ad hominem verbal attacks on minorities, women and human rights that fueled his campaign. However, neither was he forthcoming on how he means to muster the fractious legislative branch and convince special interests, not least the military, to get behind pension reform and return Brazil to solvency.
Economic liberalism has not yet won the day.
“Don’t expect a sweeping liberal consensus,” Schuler said. “With the region’s stubborn levels of poverty and inequality, Latin America will always be a political cauldron, vulnerable to the enchantments of populism of the left or right.”
That is a caveat Guaido, or whoever rises to govern from the Venezuelan disaster, needs to keep in mind.
Mac Margolis is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Latin and South America.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations