More than a decade after tainted infant milk powder in China killed six children and exposed institutional neglect of food safety, Chinese parents still do not trust local companies to feed their babies.
That could mean another goldmine for foreign producers as the battle for infant milk shifts to the hundreds of smaller cities beyond the metropolises of Shanghai and Beijing.
The deadly milk scandal of 2008 was a watershed moment for China’s consumers. About 300,000 children were poisoned after Chinese suppliers added melamine, a chemical used to make plastic, to powdered milk to artificially boost protein levels.
Tuesday marks the 10th anniversary of the sentencing to death in China of those at the center of the contamination and its concealment.
The scandal fueled a new era of consumer suspicion and China’s US$27 billion infant-formula industry was reshaped to the near-exclusion of homegrown companies among the market leaders.
While Chinese government regulations on milk powder production are in line with international standards, consumers like Chen Jijie, a Beijing-based mother of two, will neither forgive nor forget.
“I won’t even consider giving domestic brands a chance, even 10 years later,” said Chen, who has a two-year-old child and a newborn baby. “The incident brought my confidence in Chinese baby formula brands to the lowest level.”
Nestle SA’s share of China’s milk formula market has quadrupled since the scandal to make it the clear leader, while annual revenue at Australia and New Zealand upstart A2 Milk Co has soared to close to NZ$1 billion (US$678 million) from only NZ$1.5 million before the crisis.
Foreign milk labels are still viewed by consumers as safer, higher-quality and a mark of affluence, but domestic suppliers are fighting back with savvy branding and lower prices.
The prize is clear: With only a quarter of Chinese moms breastfeeding, China’s infant-formula market is forecast to expand 21 percent to about US$32 billion in 2023, according to Euromonitor International.
Danone and Nestle are focused on parents in so-called lower-tier cities. Danone is bolstering its e-commerce business, since there are fewer retail stores that stock its goods in rural China, while Nestle is assessing which of its products can best capture demand in these areas.
In a statement, Nestle said it carefully chooses its ingredient suppliers. The company also set up a dairy farming institute in northeast China in 2014 that helps teach farmers to produce safe, high-quality milk.
MARKETING TACTICS
Meanwhile, Chinese dairy companies are finding that some sort of association with foreign cows — real or imagined — can go a long way toward gaining market share.
Chinese milk giants Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co (內蒙伊利) and China Mengniu Dairy Co (蒙牛), both of which were found to have batches of tainted milk a decade ago, are racing to build up foreign milk sources in a bid to win over local mothers.
Mengniu sells a high-priced, made-in-New-Zealand line called Milk Deluxe, the tins of which are emblazoned with snowy, Alps-like mountains.
“Ten years ago, everyone felt depressed and said there was no hope for China’s domestic dairy industry,” Jeffrey Lu (盧敏放), Mengniu’s chief executive officer said in an interview at the World Economic Forum in Davos on Tuesday.
Most Chinese brands now have international supply chains that produce baby milk powder on par with global brands, he said.
While more than 90 percent of Chinese consumers are drinking local milk, Lu said that it is harder — and will take longer — to gain Chinese mothers’ trust for infant milk.
“We need to make the supply chain more transparent,” he said.
“In the short term, seeking overseas milk sources is the most effective way for Chinese milk powder brands to win back consumer confidence,” Hua Tai Securities consumer analyst Luo Yixin said.
Among Chinese producers of milk powder, the only company that has managed to eke out any meaningful share since the scandal is Feihe International Inc. It had 8.6 percent of the market in 2017, Euromonitor said.
Even then, Feihe’s success is likely tied to a branding campaign that implied a foreign provenance: Up until 2013, it was listed on the New York Stock Exchange and named American Dairy Inc.
After reverting to its Chinese name and going private, the company’s top-selling product line, Firmus, emphasizes that its milk is sourced from cows in the milk belt that spans from Wisconsin in the US to Hokkaido in Japan. Its cows are actually located in Heilongjiang Province in China’s northeast.
“Domestic baby formula has the highest quality in history and compares with the leading brands in the global market in technology, equipment and management,” said Feihe in a statement. “We spare no efforts to improve the technology and enhance linkages with international dairy peers.”
Products made and packaged overseas can command a price that is as much as double that of domestically produced milk, said UOB Kay Hian consumer analyst Robin Yuen.
NEW TRADING CHANNEL
In Australia and New Zealand, Asia-Pacific nations that promote their agricultural credentials, the 2008 scandal helped forge a new trading channel: China-bound infant formula sold through the mail. From Sydney to Adelaide, so-called daigou shoppers soon started clearing supermarket shelves of tins to resell them at a profit to Chinese mothers.
A2 Milk, named after a naturally occurring protein, was vaulted into China’s top league and Chinese demand now accounts for an estimated 50 percent of revenue. There is little sign of demand dropping off any time soon, even after China introduced tighter manufacturing controls and, on Jan. 1, new e-commerce rules that seek to formalize the daigou trade and make it taxable.
“We’ve got decades in this cycle and we’re right at the start,” said Keong Chan, chairman of AuMake International Ltd, a Sydney-listed owner of shops targeting Chinese buyers and resellers of Australian products, including A2 Milk powder.
The next generation of middle-class consumers in lower-tier cities “could be an even bigger market than the first,” he said.
A spokesman for A2 declined to comment.
Chief executive officer Jayne Hrdlicka said in an interview late last year that she saw “a huge opportunity” in China, as well as in the US.
China’s home-grown infant-formula producers see younger and lower-income parents, less scarred by the melamine scandal, as their hope for growth.
However, some consumers such as Chen could be lost to Chinese companies forever.
“The most important criteria for baby formula is whether it’s safe,” she said. “I only choose international brands.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under