Google is considering pulling its Google News service from Europe as regulators work toward a controversial copyright law.
The EU’s Copyright Directive will give publishers the right to demand money from the Alphabet unit, Facebook and other Web platforms when fragments of their articles show up in news search results, or are shared by users.
The law was supposed to be finalized this week, but was delayed by disagreement among member states.
Google News might quit the continent in response to the directive, Google public policy manager for Europe, the Middle East and Africa Jennifer Bernal said. The Internet company has various options, and a decision to pull out would be based on a close reading of the rules and taken reluctantly, she said.
“The council needs more time to reflect in order to reach a solid position” on the directive, said a representative of Romania, current head of the European Council, which represents the 28 member nations.
Google has said it does not make money from its news service so it is unlikely the company would take a financial hit from withdrawing.
However, news results keep mobile users coming back to its search engine, where they often pursue queries that generate lucrative ad revenue. Google also competes against rival mobile news-aggregation services from Apple and Facebook.
“I don’t buy the threat — they really need Europe,” said Francois Godard, a European media analyst at Enders Analysis, a research firm.
Google has sometimes underestimated legal trouble in Europe and irritated regulators by being slow to recognize their jurisdiction over the Mountain View, California-based business.
It has waged dozens of battles with privacy authorities, including a 2014 case over the so-called right to be forgotten that forced the company to purge sensitive details from search results.
Disputes with publishers have turned into costly antitrust investigations and a push for more legislation to curb Google’s ability to use content.
Lawmakers are still hashing out how to define small excerpts of stories and whether individual words should be covered by the copyright rules, according to an EU official who asked not to be identified.
The rules would also require Google and Facebook to actively prevent music, videos and other copyrighted content from appearing on their platforms if rights holders did not grant them a license.
Despite the delay, an agreement is possible in the next few months, two EU officials said.
If there is no accord by the spring, when European Parliament elections are held, the process would be delayed until later this year.
As with many divisive issues in European regulation, the problem is the small print. When the commission first unveiled draft rules, it proposed letting publishers waive their rights to demand payment from news-aggregation services.
The European Parliament introduced a provision last year that raises concerns among some small publishers that they would not be able to let Google distribute their content online free of charge.
The impact of a Google News withdrawal on publishers who rely on the search giant for traffic to their sites is unclear. Google shut its news service in Spain in 2014 after the country passed a law requiring Spanish publications to charge aggregators for displaying excerpts of stories.
Publishers must claim compensation for the reuse of fragments of text whether they want to or not.
The Spanish law led to small publishers losing about 13 percent of their Web traffic, according to a 2017 study released by the Spanish Association of Publishers of Periodical Publications.
That translates to a cost of at least 9 million euros (US$10.2 million), the study estimated.
Other publishers were initially opposed to the Spanish law, but argue that Google’s withdrawal did not have much impact.
“The vast majority of Spanish publishers consider Google’s decision insignificant,” said Wout van Wijk, executive director at News Media Europe, an umbrella organization representing national publishers’ associations.
The Spanish Reproduction Rights Center, which negotiates licenses and collects royalties on behalf of members, has struck licensing deals with other news aggregators that emerged after Google left, he said.
The EU decision to work on a similar rule has pitted large publishers against Internet giants, including Google, as well as some small publishers and freedom of speech activists.
“Limiting publishers’ freedom in this way will result in detrimental consequences for us, as shown by a similar experience in Spain,” European Innovative Media Publishers said in a letter in October last year to lawmakers.
Google said the new EU laws would force it to choose which publishers it would license, effectively picking winners and losers.
Bigger publishers typically offer a broader range of popular content, so smaller competitors are likely to lose out.
In a recent interview with commentator Hugh Hewitt, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo dropped a bomb. It was simple, direct and succinct, and it was one that has been long overdue. When Hewitt asked him about Taiwan, Pompeo wasted no words. He stressed how important it is “to get the language right.” Then, with no further comment, he went on to say: “Taiwan has not been a part of China.” In that one brief statement, Pompeo blew the US’ longstanding, official, 75-year-old “undecided” position on Taiwan out of the water and definitely put the US on a new track. There was more. In doing
I think it is fair to say there is a widespread sigh of relief among many Americans — particularly those of us focused on foreign policy — that the chaotic and unpredictable Trump years will soon be over. Mr. Trump brought little real knowledge or experience to his foreign policy, and it showed. He also — in my humble opinion — did not err on the side of expertise in his choice of top foreign policy officials. Nor was he particularly open to listening to advice. All in all a poor set of traits for overseeing the complex foreign policy
After more than eight years of talks, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was signed on Nov. 15, combining the individual free-trade agreements signed between ASEAN member states on the one hand, and China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand on the other. Under the leadership of ASEAN and China, most observers did not expect the RCEP to provide a high degree of openness, and the announced agreement lives up to these expectations, containing few surprises. All products covered by the RCEP tariff reductions are agricultural and industrial products, but reductions of agricultural product tariffs are very limited, for example covering
On Nov. 14, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) commented on the nation’s low birthrate, claiming that young people would surely have children if only they married first, and that the low marriage rate among young people is the cause of the rapid aging of Taiwan’s society. The Taipei City Government therefore proposed to offer subsidies to couples willing to marry. Ko’s comment stirred up a great deal of protest. As a sociology student, I would like to remind the mayor that his remarks not only decontextualized the population aging issue, but also oversimplified the low birthrate problem. First, a look at systemic